Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Sep 23;10(1):15490.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72473-x.

Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design

Hirotaka Tanabe et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

To compare the visual performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZCB00) and a multifocal IOL (ZMB00) of the same material and basic design, we evaluated postoperative parameters at 10 weeks after the last surgery in cataract patients who underwent bilateral ZCB00 or ZMB00 implantation from December 13, 2010, to July 29, 2019, with the right and left lenses implanted within 3 months of each other. The study enrolled 2,230 eyes of 1,115 patients. The monofocal group comprised 904 eyes of 452 patients (72.3 ± 6.8 years; females/males, 268/184), and the multifocal group comprised 1,326 eyes of 663 patients (67.0 ± 7.8 years; females/males, 518/145). Contrast sensitivity (4.0/2.5/1.6/1.0/0.7 degrees), contrast sensitivity with glare (1.6/1.0/0.7 degrees), and the VFQ-25 score for driving at night were significantly better in the monofocal group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). Uncorrected intermediate/near visual acuity and near spectacle independence were significantly better in the multifocal group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). The two IOL groups had different characteristics in terms of contrast sensitivity, night-time driving, uncorrected intermediate/near visual acuity and near spectacle independence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Contrast sensitivity with or without glare in the monofocal and multifocal groups before and 10 weeks after surgery on both eyes. The solid line connects the median values for each group. Each parameter was adjusted by multiple linear regression with the explanatory variables in Table 1. The significance level was set to 0.0083 after Bonferroni’s correction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Parameters that demonstrated a significant difference between the monofocal and multifocal groups at 10 weeks after surgery on both eyes. Each parameter was adjusted by multiple regression with the explanatory variables in Table 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Heatmap of correlation coefficients between all possible combinations of variables, which were adjusted by multiple regression with the explanatory variables in Table 1, in the monofocal IOL group. The asterisk * in this figure indicates a significant correlation between two parameters at p < 0.00002 after Bonferroni’s correction. The illustration was performed using a commercially available software program (R, version 3.6.1; R Core Team, 2019, Vienna, Austria.) (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/pheatmap.pdf).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heatmap of correlation coefficients between all possible combinations of variables, which were adjusted by multiple regression with the explanatory variables in Table 1, in the multifocal group. The asterisk * in this figure indicates a significant correlation between two parameters at p < 0.00002 after Bonferroni’s correction. The illustration was performed using a commercially available software program (R, version 3.6.1; R Core Team, 2019, Vienna, Austria) (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/pheatmap.pdf).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pepose JS, et al. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;144:347–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mester U, Hunold W, Wesendahl T, Kaymak H. Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2007;33:1033–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.02.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alio JL, et al. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: Comparative clinical study. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2004;30:2494–2503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alio JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D, Bernabeu G. Clinical outcomes and intraocular optical quality of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with asymmetrical light distribution. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2008;34:942–948. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.057. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zelichowska B, Rekas M, Stankiewicz A, Cervino A, Montes-Mico R. Apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: Optical and visual evaluation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2008;34:2036–2042. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.045. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types