Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 23;10(1):15543.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72491-9.

Bardoxolone conjugation enables targeted protein degradation of BRD4

Affiliations

Bardoxolone conjugation enables targeted protein degradation of BRD4

Bingqi Tong et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) has emerged as a powerful tool in drug discovery for the perturbation of protein levels using heterobifunctional small molecules. E3 ligase recruiters remain central to this process yet relatively few have been identified relative to the ~ 600 predicted human E3 ligases. While, initial recruiters have utilized non-covalent chemistry for protein binding, very recently covalent engagement to novel E3's has proven fruitful in TPD application. Herein we demonstrate efficient proteasome-mediated degradation of BRD4 by a bifunctional small molecule linking the KEAP1-Nrf2 activator bardoxolone to a BRD4 inhibitor JQ1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.A.T, J.M.M, M.S. are employees of Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research. This study was funded by the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research and the Novartis-Berkeley Center for Proteomics and Chemistry Technologies. D.K.N. is a co-founder, shareholder, and adviser for Artris Therapeutic and Frontier Medicines. T.J.M., B.T., Y.X., M.L., and J.N.S. declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Targeted protein degradation using bifunctional small molecules. (B) Selected examples of E3 ligase recruiters of varying degrees of covalent engagement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bardoxolone-based protein degradation. (A) Synthesis of CDDO–JQ1. (B) Effect of CDDO–JQ1 on BRD4 and KEAP1 levels in 231MFP cells treated with DMSO vehicle or CDDO–JQ1 for 12 h, assessed by Western blotting. (C) BRD4 levels in 231MFP cells pre-treated with vehicle, proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BTZ) (1 μM), or E1 activating enzyme inhibitor MLN7243 (1 μM) for 30 min prior to treatment with vehicle or CDDO–JQ1 (200 nM) for 12 h. (D) BRD4 levels in 231MFP cells pre-treated with DMSO vehicle or NEDD8 inhibitor MLN4924 (1 μM) for 30 min prior to treatment with DMSO vehicle or CDDO–JQ1 (200 nM) for 12 h. Blots are representative of n = 3 biological replicates/group. Data in bar graphs is expressed as individual replicate values and average ± sem. Significance shown as *p < 0.05 compared to vehicle-treated control groups and #p < 0.05 compared to CDDO-JQ1-treated groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Degraders derived from unreactive variants of CDDO do not support the degradation of BRD4. (A) Synthesis of H2-CDDO–JQ1 and 3-oxo-oleanoic acid–JQ1 (3-OOA–JQ1). (B) Effect of CDDO–JQ1, H2-CDDO–JQ1, and 3-OOA–JQ1degraders on BRD4 and KEAP1 levels in 231MFP cells assessed by Western blotting. DMSO vehicle or compounds were treated at 1 μM for 12 h. Blots are representative of n = 3 biological replicates/group. Data in bar graphs is expressed as individual replicate values and average ± sem. Significance shown as *p < 0.05 compared to vehicle-treated control groups and #p < 0.05 compared to CDDO–JQ1-treated groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Functional significance of the α-cyanoenone moiety. (A) Synthesis of de-CN-CDDO–JQ1. (B) Effect of CDDO–JQ1 and de-CN-CDDO–JQ1 on BRD4 and GAPDH levels in 231MFP cells assessed by Western blotting. DMSO vehicle or compounds were treated at 1 μM for 12 h. Blots are representative of n = 3 biological replicates/group. Data in bar graphs is expressed as individual replicate values and average ± sem. Significance shown as *p < 0.05 compared to vehicle-treated control groups and #p < 0.05 compared to CDDO–JQ1-treated groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bondeson DP, Crews CM. Targeted protein degradation by small molecules. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2017;57:107–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010715-103507. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burslem GM, Crews CM. Small-molecule modulation of protein homeostasis. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:11269–11301. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00077. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lai AC, Crews CM. Induced protein degradation: An emerging drug discovery paradigm. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017;16:101–114. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.211. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher SL, Phillips AJ. Targeted protein degradation and the enzymology of degraders. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2018;44:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.05.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Churcher I. Protac-induced protein degradation in drug discovery: Breaking the rules or just making new ones? J. Med. Chem. 2018;61:444–452. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01272. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms