Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;26(2):133-138.
doi: 10.1002/onco.13539. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

A Pilot Study of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations

A Pilot Study of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Irene Tsung et al. Oncologist. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in various solid organ malignancies. However, there are limited data regarding their safety and efficacy in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The aim of this study was to review our experience with ICIs in SOT recipients with advanced head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).

Methods: A retrospective review of ICIs used in SOT recipients from April 2011 to September 2019 was undertaken. Patient clinical and demographic features, ICI regimen, immunosuppression, treatment efficacy, and adverse events were reviewed.

Results: The seven SOT recipients (four kidney, two liver, one lung) were diagnosed with metastatic head and neck cSCC. All had undergone prior locoregional surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. At a median of 10.8 years (range, 6.6-18.1) post-transplant, six were treated with cemiplimab and one with pembrolizumab after minimizing calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) or conversion of CNI to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. During a median follow-up of 7.1 months, overall tumor response rate was 57.1% with one complete responder and three partial responders. Four patients died at a median of 135 days after starting ICI with two dying from tumor progression and two dying from other causes. Regarding adverse events, one lung transplant recipient developed severe pneumonitis that resolved with high-dose steroids, and one renal transplant patient developed progressive renal injury and died of unrelated causes. The three patients who received prophylactic prednisone all responded to cemiplimab with preserved allograft function and no adverse events.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that minimization of CNI and conversion of CNI to mTOR inhibitors along with judicious use of prophylactic steroids may allow for the safe use of ICIs in SOT recipients with advanced cSCC. Short-term efficacy appears promising, but prospective studies with further follow-up and a standardized protocol for prophylactic steroids are needed.

Implications for practice: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at increased risk of developing malignancy because of long-term post-transplant immunosuppression. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly shown to be successful in treating multiple types of cancer, SOT recipients have been excluded from clinical trials because of concerns regarding potential allograft rejection. This pilot study provides evidence that ICIs along with prophylactic steroids may be a safe and efficacious treatment option for selected SOT recipients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. However, further prospective studies using ICIs in this high-risk patient population are needed.

Keywords: Checkpoint inhibitor; Squamous cell carcinoma; Transplant recipient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart. Abbreviations: cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; SOT, solid organ transplant.

References

    1. Abdel‐Wahab N, Safa H, Abudayyeh A et al. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer in solid organ transplantation recipients: An institutional experience and a systematic review of the literature. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7:106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeLeon TT, Salomao MA, Aqel BA et al. Pilot evaluation of PD‐1 inhibition in metastatic cancer patients with a history of liver transplantation: The Mayo Clinic experience. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018;9:1054–1062. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar V, Shinagare AB, Rennke HG et al. The safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in transplant recipients: A case series and systematic review of literature. The Oncologist 2020;25:1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Reilly Zwald F, Brown M. Skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: Advances in therapy and management: Part I. Epidemiology of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;65:253–261. - PubMed
    1. Madan V, Lear JT, Szeimies RM. Non‐melanoma skin cancer. Lancet 2010;375:673–85. - PubMed