Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;21(2):460-474.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.16318. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

Pretransplant solid organ malignancy and organ transplant candidacy: A consensus expert opinion statement

Affiliations
Review

Pretransplant solid organ malignancy and organ transplant candidacy: A consensus expert opinion statement

David P Al-Adra et al. Am J Transplant. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Patients undergoing evaluation for solid organ transplantation (SOT) often have a history of malignancy. Although the cancer has been treated in these patients, the benefits of transplantation need to be balanced against the risk of tumor recurrence, especially in the setting of immunosuppression. Prior guidelines of when to transplant patients with a prior treated malignancy do not take in to account current staging, disease biology, or advances in cancer treatments. To develop contemporary recommendations, the American Society of Transplantation held a consensus workshop to perform a comprehensive review of current literature regarding cancer therapies, cancer stage-specific prognosis, the kinetics of cancer recurrence, and the limited data on the effects of immunosuppression on cancer-specific outcomes. This document contains prognosis based on contemporary treatment and transplant recommendations for breast, colorectal, anal, urological, gynecological, and nonsmall cell lung cancers. This conference and consensus documents aim to provide recommendations to assist in the evaluation of patients for SOT given a history of a pretransplant malignancy.

Keywords: cancer / malignancy / neoplasia; clinical research / practice; editorial / personal viewpoint; organ transplantation in general; patient safety; recipient selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by The American Journal of Transplantation.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Potential factors to Consider When Evaluating a Patient with a PTM for Transplantation.

Comment in

References

    1. Noone AM, Pfeiffer RM, Dorgan JF, et al. Cancer-attributable mortality among solid organ transplant recipients in the United States: 1987 through 2014. Cancer. 2019;125(15):2647–2655. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kasiske BL, Cangro CB, Hariharan S, et al. The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transplant. 2001;1 Suppl 2:3–95. - PubMed
    1. Penn I Evaluation of the candidate with a previous malignancy. Liver Transpl Surg. 1996;2(5 Suppl 1):109–113. - PubMed
    1. Acuna SA, Huang JW, Dossa F, Shah PS, Kim SJ, Baxter NN. Cancer recurrence after solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017;31(4):240–248. - PubMed
    1. Acuna SA, Sutradhar R, Kim SJ, Baxter NN. Solid Organ Transplantation in Patients With Preexisting Malignancies in Remission: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study. Transplantation. 2018;102(7):1156–1164. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types