Correlation between operative time and crowd-sourced skills assessment for robotic bariatric surgery
- PMID: 32970207
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08019-z
Correlation between operative time and crowd-sourced skills assessment for robotic bariatric surgery
Abstract
Introduction: Operative time has been traditionally used as a proxy for surgical skill and is commonly utilized to measure the learning curve, assuming that faster operations indicate a more skilled surgeon. The Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) rubric is a validated Likert scale for evaluating technical skill. We hypothesize that operative time will not correlate with the GEARS score.
Methods: Patients undergoing elective robotic sleeve gastrectomy at a single bariatric center of excellence hospital from January 2019 to March 2020 were captured in a prospectively maintained database. For step-specific scoring, videos were broken down into three steps: ligation of short gastric vessels, gastric transection, and oversewing the staple line. Overall and step-specific GEARS scores were assigned by crowd-sourced evaluators. Correlation between operative time and GEARS score was assessed with linear regression and calculation of the R2 statistic.
Results: Sixty-eight patients were included in the study, with a mean operative time of 112 ± 27.4 min. The mean GEARS score was 20.1 ± 0.81. Mean scores for the GEARS subcomponents were: bimanual dexterity 4.06 ± 0.17; depth perception 3.96 ± 0.24; efficiency 3.82 ± 0.19; force sensitivity 4.06 ± 0.20; robotic control 4.16 ± 0.21. Operative time and overall score showed no correlation (R2 = 0.0146, p = 0.326). Step-specific times and scores showed weak correlation for gastric transection (R2 = 0.0737, p = 0.028) and no correlation for ligation of short gastric vessels (R2 = 0.0262, p = 0.209) or oversewing the staple line (R2 = 0.0142, p = 0.344).
Conclusions: Operative time and crowd-sourced GEARS score were not correlated. Operative time and GEARS scores measure different performance characteristics, and future studies should consider using both a validated skills assessment tool and operative time for a more complete evaluation of skill.
Keywords: Operative time; Skill assessment; Surgical education.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Does Surgeon Experience Correlate with Crowd-Sourced Skill Assessment in Robotic Bariatric Surgery?Am Surg. 2023 Dec;89(12):5253-5262. doi: 10.1177/00031348221142586. Epub 2022 Dec 1. Am Surg. 2023. PMID: 36454236
-
A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1184-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28757439 Clinical Trial.
-
Crowdsourced versus expert evaluations of the vesico-urethral anastomosis in the robotic radical prostatectomy: is one superior at discriminating differences in automated performance metrics?J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):705-711. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0814-5. Epub 2018 Apr 30. J Robot Surg. 2018. PMID: 29713932
-
Early Australian experience in robotic sleeve gastrectomy: a single site series.ANZ J Surg. 2017 May;87(5):385-389. doi: 10.1111/ans.13545. Epub 2016 Apr 15. ANZ J Surg. 2017. PMID: 27080457 Review.
-
Transoral Robotic Surgical Proficiency Via Real-Time Tactile Collision Awareness System.Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130 Suppl 6:S1-S17. doi: 10.1002/lary.29034. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Laryngoscope. 2020. PMID: 32865822
Cited by
-
Outcome prediction in bariatric surgery through video-based assessment.Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3113-3118. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09480-8. Epub 2022 Aug 4. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 35927353
-
Controversial Role of Robot in Primary and Revisional Bariatric Surgery Procedures: Review of the Literature and Personal Experience.Front Surg. 2022 May 31;9:916652. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916652. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35711697 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of targeted educational resources to improve robotic bariatric surgery training.Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):894-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10436-9. Epub 2023 Oct 12. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 37823946
-
Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad331. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad331. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 37951600 Free PMC article.
-
Intellectual property and data ownership in the age of video recording in the operating room.Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3772-3774. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08692-8. Epub 2021 Sep 1. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34468846
References
-
- Kassite I, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Lardy H, Binet A (2019) A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity. Surg Endosc 33(2):353–365 - DOI
-
- Goh Alvin C, Goldfarb David W, Sander James C, Miles Brian J, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252 - DOI
-
- Sánchez R, Rodríguez O, Rosciano J et al (2016) Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). J Robot Surg 10(3):227–231 - DOI
-
- Kaler KS, Valley ZA, Bettir KC et al (2017) Crowdsourcing evaluation of ureteroscopic videos using the post-ureteroscopic lesion scale to assess ureteral injury. J Endourol 32(4):275–281 - DOI
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A et al (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369(15):1434–1442 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical