Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 24;21(5):1258-1265.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.5.46207.

Creation and Implementation of a Mastery Learning Curriculum for Emergency Department Thoracotomy

Affiliations

Creation and Implementation of a Mastery Learning Curriculum for Emergency Department Thoracotomy

Danielle T Miller et al. West J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a lifesaving procedure within the scope of practice of emergency physicians. Because EDT is infrequently performed, emergency medicine (EM) residents lack opportunities to develop procedural competency. There is no current mastery learning curriculum for residents to learn EDT. The purpose of this study was to develop and implement a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum to teach and assess EM residents' performance of the EDT.

Methods: We developed an EDT curriculum using a mastery learning framework. The minimum passing standard (MPS) for a previously developed 22-item checklist was determined using the Mastery Angoff approach. EM residents at a four-year academic EM residency program underwent baseline testing in performing an EDT on a simulation trainer. Performance was scored by two raters using the checklist. Learners then participated in a novel mastery learning EDT curriculum that included an educational video, hands-on instruction, and deliberate practice. After a three-month period, residents then completed initial post testing. Residents who did not meet the minimum passing standard after post testing participated in additional deliberate practice until mastery was obtained. Baseline and post-test scores, and time to completion of the procedure were compared with paired t-tests.

Results: Of 56 eligible EM residents, 54 completed baseline testing. Fifty-two residents completed post-testing until mastery was reached. The minimum passing standard was 91.1%, (21/22 items correct on the checklist). No participants met the MPS at the baseline assessment. After completion of the curriculum, all residents subsequently reached the MPS, with deliberate practice sessions not exceeding 40 minutes. Scores from baseline testing to post-testing significantly improved across all postgraduate years from a mean score of 10.2/22 to 21.4/22 (p <0.001). Mean time to complete the procedure improved from baseline testing (6 minutes [min] and 21 seconds [sec], interquartile range [IQR] = 4 min 54 sec - 7 min 51 sec) to post-testing (5 min 19 seconds, interquartile range 4 min 17sec - 6 min 15 sec; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: This simulation-based mastery learning curriculum resulted in all residents performing an EDT at a level that met or exceeded the MPS with an overall decrease in time needed to perform the procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image of the thoracotomy simulation trainer, with views of the interior chest structures: A) heart with cardiac wound; B) incised pericardium; C) inferior left lung; D) posterior ribs; E) esophagus; and (F) aorta.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Baseline testing, post-testing, and additional post-testing scores of emergency medicine residents on the emergency department thoracotomy procedural checklist with a line demarcating the minimum passing standard.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seamon MJ, Haut ER, Van Arendonk K, et al. An evidence-based approach to patient selection for emergency department thoracotomy: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(1):159–73. - PubMed
    1. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Moore FA, et al. Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: resuscitative thoracotomy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1359–63. - PubMed
    1. Chapman DM, Marx JA, Honigman B, et al. Emergency thoracotomy: comparison of medical student, resident, and faculty performances on written, computer, and animal-model assessments. Acad Emerg Med. 1994;1(4):373–81. - PubMed
    1. Hayden SR, Panacek EA. Procedural competency in emergency medicine: the current range of resident experience. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6(7):728–35. - PubMed
    1. Sanchez LD, DelaPena J, Kelly SP, et al. Procedure lab used to improve confidence in the performance of rarely performed procedures. Eur J Emerg Med. 2006;13(1):29–31. - PubMed