Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;67(11):2249-2257.
doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3026536. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

Ultrasound Elastography for Lung Disease Assessment

Ultrasound Elastography for Lung Disease Assessment

Boran Zhou et al. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Ultrasound elastography (US-E) is a noninvasive, safe, cost-effective and reliable technique to assess the mechanical properties of soft tissue and provide imaging biomarkers for pathological processes. Many lung diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and interstitial lung disease are associated with dramatic changes in mechanical properties of lung tissues. Nevertheless, US-E is rarely used to image the lung because it is filled with air. The large difference in acoustic impedance between air and lung tissue results in the reflection of the ultrasound wave at the lung surface and, consequently, the loss of most ultrasound energy. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in US-E applications in evaluating lung diseases. This article provides a comprehensive review of the technological advances of US-E research on lung disease diagnosis. We introduce the basic principles and major techniques of US-E and provide information on various applications in lung disease assessment. Finally, the potential applications of US-E to the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia is discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(a) Three groups (control, mild, and severe) of mouse lungs embedded in gelatin in plastic containers for measuring the lung surface wave speed. (b) Schematic of the experimental setup (adapted from [24]).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
(a) Eight locations over 8 mm on the mouse lung surface were used to measure the wave speed using US tracking beams. (b) Phase delay of the remaining locations, relative to the first location, is used to measure the surface wave speed. (adapted from [24]).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Experimental setup and result of LUSWE. (a) Position of the handheld shaker. (b) Magnified view of the US probe in the intercostal space. (c) US B-mode image; the blue dots are the selected points for wave speed measurements. (d) Wave phase delay relative to the first location (leftmost blue dot) measures the lung surface wave speed (adapted from [31]).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Examples of radiologic appearance, quantitative analysis, and clinical severity, along with LUSWE velocity. Case A is a healthy control with a normal chest CT and normal lungs quantitatively color-coded as dark and light green by CALIPER. LUSWE velocity is 3.94 m/s, expectedly slower than the ILD cases. Case B is a clinically and radiologically identified mild ILD case with ILAs involving 35% of the total lung volume (shown in foci of yellow and orange) and significantly higher LUSWE velocity. Case C is a case with both high clinical and visually assessed severity with diffuse disease involving 83% of the lung and high LUSWE velocity (adapted from [32]).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
B-mode and real-time US-E images of a lung lesion. The pulmonary lesion was invisible on the B-mode imaging. The lesion appeared inelastic (red on color mapping) on the US-E image. A fibrotic string connecting the lesion with the pleura was reproducible by real-time US-E imaging (adapted from [44]).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Experimental design for testing the surface wave speed. An ex vivo fresh swing lung was tested and a thick rubber pad was placed under the lung to reduce wave reflection. Water was injected into the lung through the trachea. The surface wave propagation was generated using a small vibrator and measured using an ultrasound probe (adapted from [53]).

References

    1. McLaughlin V. V.et al., “ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation task force on expert consensus documents and the American heart association: Developed in collaboration with the American college of chest physicians, American thoracic society, Inc., and the pulmonary hypertension association,” Circulation, vol. 119, no. 16, pp. 2250–2294, 2009. - PubMed
    1. Li L.et al., “Using artificial intelligence to detect COVID-19 and community-acquired pneumonia based on pulmonary CT: Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy,” Radiology, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. E65–E71, 2020, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200905. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reissig A., Gramegna A., and Aliberti S., “The role of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of community-acquired pneumonia,” Eur. J. Internal Med., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 391–397, Jul. 2012. - PubMed
    1. Hu Q.-J.et al., “Diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumonia: A bivariate meta-analysis,” Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 115, 2014. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tardella M., Di Carlo M., Carotti M., Filippucci E., Grassi W., and Salaffi F., “Ultrasound B-lines in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: Cut-off point definition for the presence of significant pulmonary fibrosis,” Medicine, vol. 97, no. 18, p. e0566, May 2018. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types