Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 22;9(9):3052.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9093052.

Quantitative Analysis of Somatostatin and Dopamine Receptors Gene Expression Levels in Non-functioning Pituitary Tumors and Association with Clinical and Molecular Aggressiveness Features

Affiliations

Quantitative Analysis of Somatostatin and Dopamine Receptors Gene Expression Levels in Non-functioning Pituitary Tumors and Association with Clinical and Molecular Aggressiveness Features

Álvaro Flores-Martinez et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The primary treatment for non-functioning pituitary tumors (NFPTs) is surgery, but it is often unsuccessful. Previous studies have reported that NFPTs express receptors for somatostatin (SST1-5) and dopamine (DRDs) providing a rationale for the use of dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogues. Here, we systematically assessed SST1-5 and DRDs expression by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in a large group of patients with NFPTs (n = 113) and analyzed their potential association with clinical and molecular aggressiveness features. SST1-5 expression was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry. SST3 was the predominant SST subtype detected, followed by SST2, SST5, and SST1. DRD2 was the dominant DRD subtype, followed by DRD4, DRD5, and DRD1. A substantial proportion of NFPTs displayed marked expression of SST2 and SST5. No major association between SSTs and DRDs expression and clinical and molecular aggressiveness features was observed in NFPTs.

Keywords: dopamine receptor; invasion; non-functioning pituitary tumors; pituitary tumor; somatostatin receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This work was partly supported by a grant from Novartis Oncology Spain to A.S.-M. and D.A.C. Novartis Oncology did not have any role in the design, data collection and analysis of the study. The authors confirm that there are no other conflicts of interest regarding this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) and dopamine receptors (DRDs) expression in NFPTs. Expression profile of SSTs and DRDs in: (A) NFPTs, gonadotropin-storing adenomas, null cell adenomas and silent corticotroph adenomas; (B) only in gonadotropin-storing adenomas; (C) only in null cell adenomas; and, (D) only in silent corticotroph adenomas. mRNA expression levels were measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Copy numbers of each transcript was adjusted by the expression levels of a control gene (ACTB). Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Immunohistochemical detection of somatostatin receptors (SSTs) in NFPTs assessed by immunohistochemistry. (A) Representative pictures of SST2, SST3 and SST5 immunohistochemical scores in NFPTs. Score 1, no or only cytoplasmic immunoreactivity; score 2, membranous immunoreactivity in less than 50% of cells; score 3, membranous immunoreactivity in more than 50% of cells. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Percentage of NFPTs for immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores (SST2, SST3 and SST5).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Accumulation of E-cadherin in NFPTs assessed by immunohistochemistry. (A) Representative pictures of E-cadherin immunohistochemical scores in NFPTs. Score 1, no or very low immunoreactivity; score 2, membranous immunoreactivity in less than 50% of cells; score 3, membranous immunoreactivity in more than 50% of cells. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Percentage of NFPTs for IHC scores. Score 1: 9.47%; score 2: 50.52% and score 3: 40%.

References

    1. Melmed S. Pituitary-tumor endocrinopathies. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:937–950. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1810772. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ntali G., Wass J.A. Epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2018;21:111–118. doi: 10.1007/s11102-018-0869-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dworakowska D., Grossman A.B. Aggressive and malignant pituitary tumours: State-of-the-art. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 2018;25:R559–R575. doi: 10.1530/ERC-18-0228. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Øystese K.A., Evang J.A., Bollerslev J. Non-Functioning pituitary adenomas: Growth and aggressiveness. Endocrine. 2016;53:28–34. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-0940-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zatelli M.C. Pathogenesis of non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2018;21:130–137. doi: 10.1007/s11102-018-0874-6. - DOI - PubMed