Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 24;18(1):109.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00612-x.

Evaluation of the performance and achievements of the WHO Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe

Louise Lester  1 , Michelle M Haby  2   3 , Evelina Chapman  4 , Tanja Kuchenmüller  5
Affiliations

Evaluation of the performance and achievements of the WHO Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe

Louise Lester et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: The Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) is one of the key mechanisms introduced by WHO to reduce the research-to-policy gap. EVIPNet Europe was launched in 2012. We evaluated the performance and achievements of EVIPNet Europe with the overall aims (1) to inform future developments and strategic planning of EVIPNet Europe and (2) to contribute to the evidence base for organisational knowledge translation activities by sharing the lessons learnt.

Methods: The evaluation covered the WHO Secretariat of EVIPNet Europe and its 21 member countries, from its inception to mid-2018. A mixed methods design was used to assess changes in three domains, including triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods, based on the EVIPNet Europe Monitoring & Evaluation framework and theory of change. Data were collected between August and October 2018. Data collection comprised documentary review, social media analysis, online country evaluation, key informant interviews and validated tools. Two case studies were also developed.

Results: The evaluation showed promising results as well as lessons to guide the future development of EVIPNet in the WHO European Region and other regions of the world. EVIPNet Europe appears to be filling a niche in promoting the capacity of Network member countries for evidence-informed policy-making. There is evidence that EVIPNet Europe's capacity-building programme of work is improving knowledge and skills at the individual level. There has been an increase in activity and outputs since its establishment and evidence has been used to inform new policies in some member countries. However, the speed at which member countries are developing or publishing products varies greatly and no formalised knowledge translation platforms have yet been created. Financial and human resources are limited and staff turnover is a cause for concern, both at the WHO Secretariat and country team levels.

Conclusions: Six years since the launch of EVIPNet Europe, the Network has grown quickly, is clearly valued and has had some successes. However, more work and support are needed if it is to achieve its vision of a Europe in which high-quality, context-sensitive evidence routinely informs health decision-making processes that ultimately serve to strengthen health outcomes across the Region.

Keywords: Knowledge translation, evidence-informed policy, network, evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LL was a consultant of the WHO Regional Office for Europe during the conduct of the evaluation. MH was contracted by the WHO Regional Office for Europe during the writing of this manuscript. EC was a staff member of the WHO Regional Office for Europe during the writing of this manuscript. TK is a staff member of the WHO Regional Office for Europe and is coordinating the WHO Secretariat of EVIPNet Europe. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
EVIPNet’s networked governance structure. Source: WHO Regional Office for Europe [25]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
EVIPNet Europe Theory of change: research uptake and policies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21704. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong R, Waters E, Dobbins M, Anderson L, Moore L, Petticrew M, et al. Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan. Implement Sci. 2013;8:121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haby MM, Chapman E, Clark R, Barreto J, Reveiz L, Lavis JN. Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision making in the Americas Region: using the best available evidence and case studies. Implement Sci. 2016;11:117. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macintyre S. Evidence based policy making: impact on health inequalities still needs to be assessed. BMJ. 2003;326:5–6. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources