Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 24;10(1):15600.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72397-6.

Exoskeleton home and community use in people with complete spinal cord injury

Affiliations

Exoskeleton home and community use in people with complete spinal cord injury

Rosanne B van Dijsseldonk et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

A consequence of a complete spinal cord injury (SCI) is the loss of gait capacity. Wearable exoskeletons for the lower extremity enable household and community ambulation in people with SCI. This study assessed the amount, purpose, and location of exoskeleton use in the home and community environment, without any restrictions. The number of steps taken was read from the exoskeleton software. Participants kept a daily logbook, and completed two user experience questionnaires (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (D-QUEST) and System Usability Scale (SUS)). Fourteen people with a complete SCI used the ReWalk exoskeleton a median of 9 (range [1-15]) out of 16 ([12-21]) days, in which participants took a median of 3,226 ([330-28,882]) steps. The exoskeleton was mostly used for exercise purposes (74%) and social interaction (20%). The main location of use was outdoors (48%). Overall, participants were satisfied with the exoskeleton (D-QUEST 3.7 ± 0.4) and its usability (SUS 72.5 [52.5-95.0]). Participants with complete SCI report satisfaction with the exoskeleton for exercise and social interaction in the home and community, but report limitations as an assistive device during daily life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of the logbook during the period of home and community use.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Purpose of exoskeleton use during the period of home and community use.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Location of exoskeleton use during the period of home and community use.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of the satisfaction scores on the items of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (D-QUEST). A satisfaction score of ‘more or less satisfied’ or less (D-QUEST ≤ 3) was considered dissatisfied. The numbers in brackets represent how frequent an item was indicated within the top 3 most important items of the D-QUEST by the participants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee BB, Cripps RA, Fitzharris M, Wing PC. The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: Update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:110–116. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.158. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele J-J. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: What learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord. 2006;44:523–529. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101893. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goulet J, Richard-Denis A, Thompson C, Mac-Thiong JM. Relationships between specific functional abilities and health-related quality of life in chronic traumatic spinal cord injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2019;98:14–19. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baunsgaard CB, et al. Gait training after spinal cord injury: Safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics article. Spinal Cord. 2018;56:106–116. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0013-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gagnon DH, et al. Locomotor training using an overground robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with a chronic spinal cord injury living in the community: Lessons learned from a feasibility study in terms of recruitment, attendance, learnability, performa. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2018;15:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0354-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types