Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;30(10):1409-1417.
doi: 10.1111/exd.14198. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Characterization of the microbiome in the infant diapered area: Insights from healthy and damaged skin

Affiliations

Characterization of the microbiome in the infant diapered area: Insights from healthy and damaged skin

Amber Teufel et al. Exp Dermatol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

It has been recognized for nearly a century that human beings are inhabited by a remarkably dense and diverse microbial ecosystem, yet we are only just beginning to understand and appreciate the many roles that these microbes play in human health and development. Establishment of the microbiome begins at birth, but many previous studies on infant skin health have focused on Candida species. Little is known on the full microbial composition across different areas and even less is known on how these communities change during disease/inflammatory states. In this clinical study, infants were recruited during periods of diaper dermatitis (DD) and health to characterize the skin microbiome in these two states. Substantial shifts in the skin microbiome were observed across four sites in the diapered area (genitals, intertriginous, buttocks and perianal), as well as during periods of DD. As DD scores increased, there was a shift in relative abundance that demonstrated higher community percentages of faecal coliforms, such as Enterococcus, and lower percentages of Staphylococcus strains. In high-rash samples, the predominant Staphylococcus species is S aureus, potentially implicating S aureus as a DD aetiological agent. This study provides new information related to the microbiome on infant skin in the diapered area and provides insights into the role of the microbiome in the development of DD.

Keywords: Candida; Staphylococcus; diaper rash; infant; microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors are full‐time employees at Procter & Gamble. This study was funded by Procter & Gamble.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Baby diapered area microbiome profile—genus level. Fungal and bacterial relative abundance is demonstrated by region within the diapered area from which the sample was taken' perianal, buttock, genital and intertriginous zones
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Baby diapered area microbiome profile—species level. Fungal and bacterial relative abundance is demonstrated by region within the diapered area from which the sample was taken' perianal, buttock, genital and intertriginous zones
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Baby diaper rash microbiome profile—genus level. Fungal and bacterial relative abundance is demonstrated by the level of rash each infant experienced: no rash, low rash or high rash
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Baby diaper rash microbiome profile—species level. Fungal and bacterial relative abundance is demonstrated by the level of rash each infant experienced: no rash, low rash or high rash
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Shannon diversity scores for 16s was classified by site (Panel A: Kruskal Wallis chi‐squared = 98.67, P‐value <2.2e‐16), rash severity (Panel B: Kruskal Wallis chi‐squared = 0.583, P‐value = 0.747), and both site and rash (Panel C: Kruskal Wallis chi‐squared = 104.5, P‐value <2.2e‐16). Shannon diversity scores for ITS was classified by site (Panel D: Kruskal Wallis chi‐squared = 6.258, P‐value = 0.099), rash severity (Panel E: Kruskal Wallis chi‐squared = 0.984, P‐value = 0.611), and both site and rash (Panel F: Kruskal Wallis chi‐squared = 19.39, P‐value = 0.036).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Bray‐curtis distance by subject for 16s and ITS among site, rash severity and site/rash. 16s Beta diversity was measured using Bray‐Curtis distance by site (Panel A: P‐value =.001), rash severity (Panel B: P‐value =.006) and by site/rash (Panel C: P‐value =.001). ITS Beta diversity was measured using Bray‐Curtis distance by site (Panel D: P‐value =.001), rash severity (Panel E: P‐value =.005) and by site/rash (Panel F: P‐value =.001)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schneider A. M., Nelson A. M., Ped Dermatol 2019, 36, 815. - PubMed
    1. Capone K. A., Dowd S. E., Stamatas G. N., Nikolovski J., J Investig Dermatol 2011, 131, 2026. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Segre J., Kong H., Tirosh O., Byrd A., FASEB J 2019, 33;93.
    1. Timm C. M., Loomis K., Stone W., Mehoke T., Brensinger B., Pellicore M., Staniczenko P. P., Charles C., Nayak S., Karig D. K., Microbiome 2020, 8, 1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dimitriu P. A., Iker B., Malik K., Leung H., Mohn W. W., Hillebrand G. G., MBio 2019, 10, e00839. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types