Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 29;47(3):692-694.
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa132.

Do Psychological Interventions Work for Psychosis in Adolescents?

Affiliations
Review

Do Psychological Interventions Work for Psychosis in Adolescents?

Rhea Daruvala et al. Schizophr Bull. .

Abstract

Background: There is emerging evidence to show that psychological interventions such as cognitive remediation therapy (CRT), psychoeducation, family therapy, and group psychotherapies may be useful for adolescents with psychosis. The current review is on the effects of various psychological interventions for adolescents with psychosis compared with treatment as usual (TAU) or other psychological interventions.

Methods: We undertook a comprehensive search for all randomized controlled trials on the topic as per predefined criteria. For binary data, a standard estimation of risk ratio, and, for continuous data, the mean difference between groups were estimated. GRADE approach was used to assess studies. "Risk of Bias" was calculated, and finally random-effects model was used for analyses.

Results: The review included 7 studies (n = 317). Two studies compared CRT and TAU with TAU alone. CRT showed improvement in short-term memory compared with those in the TAU group (relative risk 0.58, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.89, participants = 31, very low-certainty evidence). When comparing group psychosocial therapy with TAU, global state scores measured using Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were clearly higher in the intervention arm (mean difference 5.10, 95% CI 1.35 to 8.85, participants = 56, very low-certainty evidence) as compared with the TAU group. None of the other interventions were found to be significantly effective for the treatment of psychosis in adolescents.

Conclusions: Evidence suggests that psychological interventions may have beneficial effects in the treatment of adolescents with psychosis, but the evidence is of low or very low certainty.

Keywords: adolescents; psychological intervention; psychosis; schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Risk of bias of included studies of psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Post-intervention effect on cognitive functioning: Not attaining normal cognitive function for comparison of cognitive remediation therapy plus treatment as usual vs treatment as usual.

References

    1. Datta SS, Daruvala R, Kumar A. Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;( 7). Art. No.: CD009533. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009533.pub2. - PMC - PubMed