Comparison of Two Automated Immunoassays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antibodies
- PMID: 32976593
- PMCID: PMC7543392
- DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa175
Comparison of Two Automated Immunoassays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antibodies
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel member of the coronavirus family that caused the global coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The prevalence remains largely unknown because of early testing supply shortages. Although it cannot currently be used to determine level of immunity, antibody testing can contribute to epidemiological studies, identify convalescent plasma donors, or satisfy curiosity about previous exposure to the virus.
Methods: 407 samples collected from hospitalized inpatients with and without a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 170 remnant clinical specimens collected and frozen prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, and paired serum and plasma samples from 23 convalescent plasma donors were used to determine performance characteristics of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays. The sensitivity, specificity, imprecision, interferences, and sample stability were determined. These assays were then used to characterize the antibody response in serial samples from 20 SARS-CoV-2 positive inpatients.
Results: Both assays exhibited 100% specificity (95% CI; 99.05-100.00), giving no positive results in 170 specimens collected before July 2019 and 215 specimens from patients without a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Differences between platforms were most notable in SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. Roche offered higher sensitivity in convalescent plasma donors at 95.7% (95% CI; 78.1-99.9) versus 91.3% (95% CI; 72.0-98.9) but Abbott detected antibodies in 2 immunocompromised patients whereas Roche did not. The Roche and Abbott platforms also exhibited different trends in antibody signal for a subset of patients.
Conclusions: Both the Abbott and Roche platforms offer excellent specificity but different trends in antibody signal may reflect qualitative differences in the types of antibodies recognized by the 2 assays. Negative serologic results do not exclude previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Keywords: COVID-19; IgG; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; convalescent; coronavirus.
© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays.Clin Biochem. 2021 Sep;95:77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Clin Biochem. 2021. PMID: 34118242 Free PMC article.
-
Analytical and Clinical Analysis of Two Automated Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Patient Populations.J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;6(2):441-450. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa204. J Appl Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 33152084 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Health Care Workers: A Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Three Commercially Available Antibody Assays.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0039121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00391-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34585976 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Roche) and VIDAS Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Biomérieux) for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid and Spike Protein Antibody Detection.EJIFCC. 2022 Aug 8;33(2):159-165. eCollection 2022 Aug. EJIFCC. 2022. PMID: 36313907 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In vitro diagnostics of coronavirus disease 2019: Technologies and application.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021 Apr;54(2):164-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 Jun 5. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021. PMID: 32513617 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays.Clin Biochem. 2021 Sep;95:77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Clin Biochem. 2021. PMID: 34118242 Free PMC article.
-
Specificity testing by point prevalence as a simple assessment strategy using the Roche Elecsys® anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay.Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:632-638. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Feb 10. Int J Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33578017 Free PMC article.
-
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36394900 Free PMC article.
-
Review of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen and Antibody Testing in Diagnosis and Community Surveillance.Clin Lab Med. 2022 Dec;42(4):687-704. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2022.09.018. Clin Lab Med. 2022. PMID: 36368790 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous