European Headache Federation recommendations for placebo and nocebo terminology
- PMID: 32977761
- PMCID: PMC7519524
- DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01178-3
European Headache Federation recommendations for placebo and nocebo terminology
Abstract
Background and aim: Despite recent publications, practitioners remain unfamiliar with the current terminology related to the placebo and nocebo phenomena observed in clinical trials and practice, nor with the factors that modulate them. To cover the gap, the European Headache Federation appointed a panel of experts to clarify the terms associated with the use of placebo in clinical trials.
Methods: The working group identified relevant questions and agreed upon recommendations. Because no data were required to answer the questions, the GRADE approach was not applicable, and thus only expert opinion was provided according to an amended Delphi method. The initial 12 topics for discussion were revised in the opinion of the majority of the panelists, and after a total of 6 rounds of negotiations, the final agreement is presented.
Results/recommendations: Two primary and mechanism-based recommendations are provided for the results of clinical trials: [1] to distinguish the placebo or nocebo response from the placebo or nocebo effect; and [2] for any favorable outcome observed after placebo administration, the term "placebo response" should be used, and for any unfavorable outcome recorded after placebo administration, the term "nocebo response" should be used (12 out of 17 panelists agreed, 70.6% agreement). The placebo or nocebo responses are attributed to a set of factors including those that are related to the medical condition (e.g. natural history, random comorbidities, etc.), along with idiosyncratic ones, in which the placebo or nocebo effects are attributed to idiosyncratic, or nonspecific mechanisms, exclusively (e.g. expectation, conditioning, observational learning etc.). To help investigators and practitioners, the panel summarized a list of environmental factors and idiosyncratic dynamics modulating placebo and nocebo effects. Some of them are modifiable, and investigators or physicians need to know about them in order to modify these factors appropriately to improve treatment. One secondary recommendation addresses the use of the terms "placebo" and "nocebo" ("placebos" and "nocebos" in plural), which refer to the triggers of the placebo/nocebo effects or responses, respectively, and which are inert agents or interventions that should not be confused with the placebo/nocebo responses or effects themselves (all panelists agreed, 100% agreement).
Conclusion: The working group recommends distinguishing the term response from effect to describe health changes from before to after placebo application and to distinguish the terms placebo(s) or nocebo(s) from the health consequences that they cause (placebo/nocebo responses or effects).
Keywords: Nocebo; Nocebo effect; Nocebo response; Placebo; Placebo effect; Placebo response.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors, Financial disclosure (consulting, speaking fees, travel grants, research support).
Dimos D. Mitsikostas: Allergan, Amgen, Bayer, Biogen, Cefaly, Electrocore, Genesis Pharma, Eli Lily, Merck-Serono, Merz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Specifar, Teva.
Charlotte Blease reports no competing interests.
Elisa Carlino reports no competing interests.
Luana Colloca reports no competing interests.
Andrew L. Geers reports no competing interests.
Jeremy Howick reports no competing interests.
Andrea WM Evers reports no competing interests.
Magne A. Flaten reports no competing interests.
John M. Kelley reports no competing interests.
Irving Kirsch reports no competing interests.
Regine Klinger reports no competing interests.
Antoinette Maassen van den Brink: Allergan, Amgen/Novartis, Lilly, Teva.
Daniel E. Moerman reports no competing interests.
Petros P. Sfikakis reports no competing interests.
Lene Vase reports no competing interests.
Tor D. Wager reports no competing interests.
Fabrizio Benedetti reports no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Nocebo and placebo modulation of hypobaric hypoxia headache involves the cyclooxygenase-prostaglandins pathway.Pain. 2014 May;155(5):921-928. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 21. Pain. 2014. PMID: 24462931
-
What Should Clinicians Tell Patients about Placebo and Nocebo Effects? Practical Considerations Based on Expert Consensus.Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(1):49-56. doi: 10.1159/000510738. Epub 2020 Oct 19. Psychother Psychosom. 2021. PMID: 33075796
-
Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(4):204-210. doi: 10.1159/000490354. Epub 2018 Jun 12. Psychother Psychosom. 2018. PMID: 29895014 Free PMC article.
-
Placebo and nocebo in the treatment of migraine: How much does real world effectiveness depend on contextual effects?Cephalalgia. 2023 Dec;43(12):3331024231218392. doi: 10.1177/03331024231218392. Cephalalgia. 2023. PMID: 38041833 Review.
-
The Placebo and Nocebo Phenomena: Their Clinical Management and Impact on Treatment Outcomes.Clin Ther. 2017 Mar;39(3):477-486. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Feb 23. Clin Ther. 2017. PMID: 28237673 Review.
Cited by
-
Decoding the impact of the placebo response in clinical trials for chronic cough.ERJ Open Res. 2024 Oct 28;10(5):00335-2024. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00335-2024. eCollection 2024 Sep. ERJ Open Res. 2024. PMID: 39469270 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating whether socially acquired nocebo effects can spread to other treatments.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 22;15(1):30851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14118-5. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40847100 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Associations Between Interindividual Differences, Expectations and Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Itch.Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 13;12:781521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781521. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34966334 Free PMC article.
-
One of us or one of them? The effects of the model's and observer's characteristics on placebo analgesia induced by observational learning.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0243996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243996. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33326481 Free PMC article.
-
Are indirect comparisons for treatments in migraine necessitas? Many inevitable challenges to overcome.J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Jul;12(7):e230082. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0082. Epub 2023 Jun 2. J Comp Eff Res. 2023. PMID: 37265067 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Penson PE, Mancini GBJ, Toth PP, Martin SS, Watts GF, Sahebkar A, Mikhailidis DP, Banach M. Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration (LBPMC) Group & International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP). Introducing the 'Drucebo' effect in statin therapy: a systematic review of studies comparing reported rates of statin-associated muscle symptoms, under blinded and open-label conditions. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9:1023–1033. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dalkey NC, Helmer-Hirschberg O. An experimental application of the delphi method to the use of experts. Santa Monica, Calif: Rand Corp; 1962.
-
- Schedlowski M, Enck P, Rief W, Bingel U. Neuro-bio-behavioral mechanisms of placebo and Nocebo responses: implications for clinical trials and clinical practice. Pharmacol Rev. 2015;67:697–730. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous