Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):254-262.
doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

Introducing a new method of retinoscopy for refraction of infants and young children: The "Mirza" tele lens retinoscopy

Affiliations

Introducing a new method of retinoscopy for refraction of infants and young children: The "Mirza" tele lens retinoscopy

Ali Mirzajani et al. J Optom. 2021 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the refractive error of the uncooperative infants and children with the new method of retinoscopy called the tele-lens ("Mirza") retinoscopy.

Methods: In the "Mirza" tele-lens retinoscopy, the examiner placed the trial lenses in 1/3 distance between the tested eye person and peephole of the retinoscope (22.2 cm far from the spectacle plane). First, the optical calculations were done to find the correction factors for this new method of retinoscopy. Second, the dry standard and "Mirza" tele-lens retinoscopy were performed in 78 eyes from 39 children aged 7-12 years with good cooperation and next, the procedure was repeated using cyclopentolate drops and then the results of the two methods were compared, and at the end, the dry "Mirza" tele-lens retinoscopy was done in the 60 eyes of 31 uncooperative infants with a mean age of 21.85 ± 8.79 months for evaluating the feasibility of the "Mirza" tele-lens retinoscopy procedure. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot for assessment of agreement between the findings of two retinoscopic methods in dry and cyclo conditions were used.

Results: The comparison between the dry standard and "Mirza" tele-lens retinoscopic results with means of 1.39 ± 1.43 and1.36 ± 1.39, respectively were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Besides, comparing the mean cycloplegic results of two methods (standard vs. "Mirza" tele-lens), the difference was not statistically significant (2.37 ± 1.44 vs. 2.41 ± 1.37) (p > 0.05). Moreover, Two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant retinoscopy method × use of drops interaction (P = 0.103) in comparing two methods of the standard and "Mirza" tele-lens retinoscopy. ICC results indicated high agreement between two methods in both dry (ICC = 0.993) and cyclo (ICC = 0.989) conditions.

Conclusions: The "Mirza" tele-lens retinoscopy method can be performed with satisfactory results in infants and children who do not cooperate for the standard procedure of measuring the refractive errors.

Keywords: Infants; Refraction; Retinoscopy; Uncooperative children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The “Mirza” tele-lens and standard retinoscopy. In A, the child’s reaction to approaching the trial lens in standard retinoscopy procedure was showed. In B, the trial lens magnification from its position farther from the spectacle plate was illustrated. In C, the “Mirza” tele-lens retinoscopy was performed by placing the trial lens at 22.2 cm far from the child’s spectacle plane.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effect of working distance changes from 22.2 to 3 cm back and forth on the “Mirza” tele-lens retinoscopy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bland–Altman plots showing the agreement of the dry (A) and cycloplegic (B) results taken with the standard and “Mirza” tele-lens retinoscopic methods. The solid line indicates the mean difference, and the dotted lines indicate 95% limits of agreement.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Retinoscopes: Past and present.
    Musa M, Enaholo E, Bale BI, Salati C, Spadea L, Zeppieri M. Musa M, et al. World J Methodol. 2024 Sep 20;14(3):91497. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i3.91497. eCollection 2024 Sep 20. World J Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39310243 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Logan N.S., Gilmartin B. School vision screening, ages 5–16 years: the evidence-base for content, provision and efficacy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:481–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00247.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braverman R. Diagnosis and treatment of refractive errors in the pediatric population. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18:379–383. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328244dfed. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nurse C.O. Preschool vision screening tests administered by nurse screeners compared with lay screeners in the vision in preschoolers study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2639–2648. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0141. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore B. 1st ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Medical; Boston: 1997. Eye Care for Infants and Young Children.
    1. Rosenfield M., Logan N. 2nd ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; Amsterdam: 2009. Optometry: Science techniques and clinical management.