Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 10;86(23):e01861-20.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01861-20. Print 2020 Nov 10.

Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Environmental Microbiota in Food Processing Plants as Impacted by Cleaning and Sanitizing Procedures: the Case of Slaughterhouses and Gaseous Ozone

Affiliations

Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Environmental Microbiota in Food Processing Plants as Impacted by Cleaning and Sanitizing Procedures: the Case of Slaughterhouses and Gaseous Ozone

Cristian Botta et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

Microbial complexity and contamination levels in food processing plants heavily impact the final product fate and are mainly controlled by proper environmental cleaning and sanitizing. Among the emerging disinfection technologies, ozonation is considered an effective strategy to improve the ordinary cleaning and sanitizing of slaughterhouses. However, its effects on contamination levels and environmental microbiota still need to be understood. For this purpose, we monitored the changes in microbiota composition in different slaughterhouse environments during the phases of cleaning/sanitizing and ozonation at 40, 20, or 4 ppm. Overall, the meat processing plant microbiota differed significantly between secondary processing rooms and deboning rooms, with a greater presence of psychrotrophic taxa in secondary processing rooms because of their lower temperatures. Cleaning/sanitizing procedures significantly reduced the contamination levels and in parallel increased the number of detectable operational taxonomic units (OTUs), by removing the masking effect of the most abundant human/animal-derived OTUs, which belonged to the phylum Firmicutes Subsequently, ozonation at 40 or 20 ppm effectively decreased the remaining viable bacterial populations. However, we could observe selective ozone-mediated inactivation of psychrotrophic bacteria only in the secondary processing rooms. There, the Brochothrix and Pseudomonas abundances and their viable counts were significantly affected by 40 or 20 ppm of ozone, while more ubiquitous genera like Staphylococcus showed a remarkable resistance to the same treatments. This study showed the effectiveness of highly concentrated gaseous ozone as an adjunct sanitizing method that can minimize cross-contamination and so extend the meat shelf life.IMPORTANCE Our in situ survey demonstrates that RNA-based sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons is a reliable approach to qualitatively probe, at high taxonomic resolution, the changes triggered by new and existing cleaning/sanitizing strategies in the environmental microbiota in human-built environments. This approach could soon represent a fast tool to clearly define which routine sanitizing interventions are more suitable for a specific food processing environment, thus limiting the costs of special cleaning interventions and potential product loss.

Keywords: RNA-based surveillance; environmental microbiota; gaseous ozone; meat processing plants; spoilage bacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
(a) Stacked bar plots showing the microbiota composition (relative abundance) in phylum, class, and family taxon ranks, with a color coding key; samples are grouped according to the origin (plant and room type) and then according to the temporal phase (BC, ACS, or AOT). (b) Venn diagram displaying the number of shared OTUs at the genus level (or the highest taxonomic rank available when genus determination was not achievable) among the four environments considered (A-DR, A-PR, B-PR, and C-DR). (c) Box plots displaying the logarithmically transformed relative abundances of core OTUs in the four environments; Kruskal-Wallis test P values are displayed, and different box plot colors highlight significantly different abundances (P < 0.05 [FDR adjusted], Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests).
FIG 2
FIG 2
Co-occurrence networks of bacterial oligotypes belonging to Achromobacter, Acinetobacter, Psychrobacter, Pseudomonas, Propionibacterium, Carnobacterium, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus. Each network is based on the log-transformed relative abundance matrix of each genus, and the edges represent significant positive correlations (co-occurrence) between the oligotypes (nodes) by means of Spearman’s correlations (rho > 0.6; FDR, P < 0.001). Nodes were made proportional to the weighted degree (total occurrence of an oligotype in the whole data set) and are colored in relation to the species of belonging. Edges were made proportional to the Spearman’s rho value. The M and D values shown in the box represent the modularity (clustering coefficient) and density (calculated using the ratio of the number of edges) of each genus-based network.
FIG 3
FIG 3
TVCs detected in the four environments (A-DR, A-PR, B-PR, and C-DR) across the three temporal phases, i.e., BC, ACS, and AOT performed at 40 ppm (A-DR and A-PR), 20 ppm (B-PR), or 4 ppm (C-DR) of ozone (concentrations used are displayed for each environment). Box plot colors highlight significant differences (P < 0.05 [FDR adjusted], Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests) among the TVCs of the three temporal phases (BC, ACS, and AOT).
FIG 4
FIG 4
(a and b) Box plots displaying abundance decreases of the core OTUs (a) and the variations of α-diversity measures (b) that occurred in each environment before (BC) (blue) and after (ACS) (orange) the cleaning/sanitizing phase. Asterisks highlight significant differences (FDR-adjusted P value from Wilcoxon’s test); *, 0.05; **, 0.01; ***, 0.001. (c) PCoA chart displaying the weighted UniFrac distance matrix (β-diversity) of the environment PR of plant A before (BC) and after (ACS) cleaning/sanitizing procedures; BC and ACS are different communities (P < 0.001 [FDR adjusted], ANOSIM and Adonis tests).
FIG 5
FIG 5
(a) Pseudo-heatmap summarizing the abundance variations of the 10 core OTUs (>50% of the total abundance in >80% of the samples) occurred during the ozone treatments. Asterisks highlight significant decreases in relative abundances in each environment after ozone treatment at 40, 20, or 4 ppm (FDR-adjusted P value from Wilcoxon’s test). *, 0.05; **, 0.01; ***, 0.001. (b) Viable counts of Brochothrix, Pseudomonas, and Staphylococcus before (ACS) and after (AOT 20) the 20-ppm ozonation carried out in the environment B-PR; box plot colors highlight significant differences between ACS and AOT 20 counts (P < 0.05 [FDR adjusted], Wilcoxon’s test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Doyle CJ, O'Toole PW, Cotter PD. 2017. Metagenome-based surveillance and diagnostic approaches to studying the microbial ecology of food production and processing environments. Environ Microbiol 19:4382–4391. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13859. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang X, Tran F, Youssef MK, Gill CO. 2015. Determination of sources of Escherichia coli on beef by multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis. J Food Prot 78:1296–1302. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams GD, Keener KM. 2013. Design considerations for the construction and operation of meat and poultry processing facilities. ASABE Meet, paper 082382. doi:10.13031/2013.24882. - DOI
    1. Nel S, Lues JFR, Buys EM, Venter P. 2004. Bacterial populations associated with meat from the deboning room of a high throughput red meat abattoir. Meat Sci 66:667–674. doi:10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00187-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shale K, Jacoby A, Plaatjies Z. 2006. The impact of extrinsic sources on selected indicator organisms in a typical deboning room. Int J Environ Health Res 16:263–272. doi:10.1080/09603120600734162. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types