Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;27(36):44807-44819.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10917-7. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

Lake water-level fluctuation forecasting using machine learning models: a systematic review

Senlin Zhu  1   2 , Hongfang Lu  3 , Mariusz Ptak  4 , Jiangyu Dai  5 , Qingfeng Ji  6
Affiliations

Lake water-level fluctuation forecasting using machine learning models: a systematic review

Senlin Zhu et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Lake water-level fluctuation is a complex and dynamic process, characterized by high stochasticity and nonlinearity, and difficult to model and forecast. In recent years, applications of machine learning (ML) models have yielded substantial progress in forecasting lake water-level fluctuations. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the applications of ML models for modeling water-level dynamics in lakes. Among the many existing ML models, seven popular ML model types are reviewed: (1) artificial neural network (ANN); (2) support vector machine (SVM); (3) artificial neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS); (4) hybrid models, such as hybrid wavelet-artificial neural network (WA-ANN) model, hybrid wavelet-artificial neuro-fuzzy inference system (WA-ANFIS) model, and hybrid wavelet-support vector machine (WA-SVM) model; (5) evolutionary models, such as gene expression programming (GEP) and genetic programming (GP); (6) extreme learning machine (ELM); and (7) deep learning (DL). Model inputs, data split, model performance criteria, and model inter-comparison as well as the associated issues are discussed. The advantages and limitations of the established ML models are also discussed. Some specific directions for future research are also offered. This review provides a new vision for hydrologists and water resources planners for sustainable management of lakes.

Keywords: Lakes; Machine learning; Nonlinearity; Stochasticity; Water-level modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adamowski J, Chan HF (2011) A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J Hydrol 407:28–40
    1. Adamowski J, Sun K (2010) Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. J Hydrol 390(1-2):85–91
    1. Adamowski J, Chan HF, Prasher SO, Ozga-Zielinski B, Sliusarieva A (2012) Comparison of multiple linear and nonlinear regression, autoregressive integrated moving average, artificial neural network, and wavelet artificial neural network methods for urban water demand forecasting in Montreal, Canada. Water Resour Res 48(1):W01528
    1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. In: Parzen E., Tanabe K., Kitagawa G. (eds) Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer Series in Statistics (Perspectives in Statistics). Springer, New York
    1. Aksoy H, Unal NE, Eris E, Yuce MI (2013) Stochastic modeling of Lake Van water level time series with jumps and multiple trends. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:2297–2303

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources