The relationship between DOAC levels and clinical outcomes: The measures tell the tale

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases, used in fixed dose regimens. Although their safety and efficacy profiles are considered optimal, clinical events still occur. Given that anticoagulation treatment is a delicate balance between clotting and bleeding, it is possible that an optimal target spot exists where the effect of anticoagulation achieves both the lowest possible risk of bleeding and thrombosis. Other currently available anticoagulants (ie, vitamin K antagonists and heparins) provide important clues for this. If such a target spot exists, tailored DOAC therapy may further benefit patients. This opinion article summarizes the current available evidence that suggests that such a tailored strategy could work. It also describes research suggestions for conducting studies in patient populations such as patients with extremes of body weight or impaired kidney function to evaluate whether tailored treatment with DOACs could lead to better patient outcomes.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; direct oral anticoagulants; epidemiology; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; venous thromboembolism.

Figure 1

Simplified illustration of the theoretical optimal “target” between risk of adverse events and net anticoagulant effect