Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct:189:109936.
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109936. Epub 2020 Jul 19.

Disparate on-site access to water, sanitation, and food storage heighten the risk of COVID-19 spread in Sub-Saharan Africa

Affiliations

Disparate on-site access to water, sanitation, and food storage heighten the risk of COVID-19 spread in Sub-Saharan Africa

Bernard Ekumah et al. Environ Res. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

COVID-19 is an active pandemic that likely poses an existential threat to humanity. Frequent handwashing, social distancing, and partial or total lockdowns are among the suite of measures prescribed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and being implemented across the world to contain the pandemic. However, existing inequalities in access to certain basic necessities of life (water, sanitation facility, and food storage) create layered vulnerabilities to COVID-19 and can render the preventive measures ineffective or simply counterproductive. We hypothesized that individuals in households without any of the named basic necessities of life are more likely to violate the preventive (especially lockdown) measures and thereby increase the risk of infection or aid the spread of COVID-19. Based on nationally-representative data for 25 sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, multivariate statistical and geospatial analyses were used to investigate whether, and to what extent, household family structure is associated with in-house access to basic needs which, in turn, could reflect on a higher risk of COVID-19 infection. The results indicate that approximately 46% of the sampled households in these countries (except South Africa) did not have in-house access to any of the three basic needs and about 8% had access to all the three basic needs. Five countries had less than 2% of their households with in-house access to all three basic needs. Ten countries had over 50% of their households with no in-house access to all the three basic needs. There is a social gradient in in-house access between the rich and the poor, urban and rural richest, male- and female-headed households, among others. We conclude that SSA governments would need to infuse innovative gender- and age-sensitive support services (such as water supply, portable sanitation) to augment the preventive measures prescribed by the WHO. Short-, medium- and long-term interventions within and across countries should necessarily address the upstream, midstream and downstream determinants of in-house access and the full spectrum of layers of inequalities including individual, interpersonal, institutional, and population levels.

Keywords: COVID-19 response; Food access; Infectious disease; Pandemic; Preventive measures; Public health; Water and sanitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The selected study countries in sub-Saharan Africa. (South Africa clusters were not geo-located).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage distribution of in-house access to basic needs in 24 countries based on urbanicity and wealth.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Spatial variation of in-house access to basic needs in sub-Saharan Africa. Access to all means in-house access to all the three basic needs; water, sanitation facility and food storage. No access means no in-house access to any of the three bascic needs. The colour of each pixel is determined by the dominant category.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abubakar I.R. Access to sanitation facilities among Nigerian households: determinants and sustainability implications. Sustainability. 2017;9(4):547.
    1. Aliaga A., Ren R. ORC Macro; Calverton, MD: 2006. Optimal Sample Sizes for Two-Stage Cluster Sampling in Demographic and Health Surveys: Working Paper 30.
    1. Armah F.A., Ekumah B., Yawson D.O., Odoi J.O., Afitiri A.R., Nyieku F.E. Access to improved water and sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa in a quarter century. Heliyon. 2018;4(11) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armah F.A., Ekumah B., Yawson D.O., Odoi J.O., Afitiri A.R., Nyieku F.E. Predictive probabilities of access to clean cooking: evidence from the demographic and health surveys in 31 countries in sub-saharan Africa. Environ. Justice. 2019;12(3):118–131.
    1. Chakravarty S.R., Lugo M.A. Poverty, Social Exclusion and Stochastic Dominance. Springer; Singapore: 2019. Multidimensional indicators of inequality and poverty; pp. 223–259.