Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Sep 27:26:e925991.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.925991.

Comparison of Effectiveness of Routine Antenatal Care with a Midwife-Managed Clinic Service in Prevention of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Early Pregnancy at a Hospital in China

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Effectiveness of Routine Antenatal Care with a Midwife-Managed Clinic Service in Prevention of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Early Pregnancy at a Hospital in China

Jingbo Qiu et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND Women with normal fasting glucose (FPG) range (5.1 ≤FPG <6.09 mmol/L) in early pregnancy are at high risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of routine antenatal care with a midwife-managed clinic service in the prevention of GDM in early pregnancy at a hospital in China. MATERIAL AND METHODS We designed a prospective observational clinical study among pregnancy women with normal fasting glucose (FPG) range (5.1 ≤FPG <6.09 mmol/L) in early pregnancy. Routine antenatal care was compared with a midwife-managed clinic service providing diet and exercise education before week 16. A 75-g OGTT was performed at weeks 24-28 for both groups. Results of OGTT and gestational weight gain were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Of the 592 eligible women, 296 women received the antenatal nursing clinic service and 296 were enrolled in a control group. Thirty-three women were lost to follow-up during the study, leaving 279 in the intervention group and 280 in the control group. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. GDM was diagnosed in 115 participants (41.2%) in the intervention group and 141 (50.4%) in the control group. Subgroup analysis showed a significantly lower rate of GDM in the intervention group among the No-IVF population (37.8% vs. 49.0%, P=0.01%). For pre-pregnancy BMI, significant differences were found in the incidence of GDM and maternal hypertension between the different groups, showing that the overweight group benefited most from the midwife-managed antenatal clinic service. CONCLUSIONS The midwife-managed clinic service was feasible and effective in the prevention of GDM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the prospective parallel group study.

References

    1. Cao X, Wang Z, Yang C, et al. Comprehensive intensive therapy for Chinese gestational diabetes benefits both newborns and mothers. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(11):1002–7. - PubMed
    1. Carolan-Olah MC. Educational and intervention programmes for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management: An integrative review. Collegian. 2016;23(1):103–14. - PubMed
    1. Lowe WL, Jr, Scholtens DM, Lowe LP, et al. Diabetes with maternal disorders of glucose metabolism and childhood adiposity. JAMA. 2018;320(10):1005–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sweeting AN, Appelblom H, Ross GP, et al. First trimester prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus: A clinical model based on maternal demographic parameters. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;7(125):44–50. - PubMed
    1. Hod M, Kapur A, Sacks DA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: A pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 3):S173–211. - PubMed

Publication types