Severe cervical inflammation and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 32980959
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05804-y
Severe cervical inflammation and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Purpose: Inflammation has been reported as a facilitator in cervical oncogenesis, but the correlation between inflammation and cytological abnormality remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between inflammation and cytological abnormality.
Methods: ThinPrep cytological test (TCT) was used to detect cervical cytological abnormalities and inflammation degrees of 46,255 women in this prospective cross-sectional study. Histopathological examination was used to define the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in patients with cervical cytological abnormalities.
Results: The study revealed that 8.87% (4102/46,255) of TCT results had cytological abnormalities. The 4102 included cases were classified as the case group, including atypical squamous cells (ASC), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Women with negative intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) were classified as the control group. About 88.83% (3644/4102) of women with cytological abnormalities showed inflammations. The rate of severe inflammation was significantly higher in the case group than the control group (23.86% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.000). Our results also showed that patients with severe inflammation had a significantly increasing incidence of cytological abnormality by 12.598 times and elevated the risk of HSIL by 756.47 times, compared to the inflammation negative group.
Conclusion: Severe inflammation was positively related to HSIL. Patients with severe cervical inflammation should be given more follow-ups and regular examinations and treated more carefully than those with mild or no inflammation.
Keywords: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cytological abnormality; HSIL; Inflammation; TCT.
References
-
- Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2002) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108
-
- Peng JR, Tao SY, Wen Y, Yang X, Ma JQ, Zhao F, Chen ZY, Zhang GT, Qiao YL, Zhao FH et al (2019) Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in urban China. Chin J Oncol 41:154–160
-
- Östör AG (1993) Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 12:186–192 - PubMed
-
- Papillo JL, Zarka MA, St John TL (1998) Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. Acta Cytol 42:203–208 - PubMed
-
- ArbynM BC, Klinkhamer P, Martin-Hirsch P, Siebers AG, Bulten J (2008) Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 111:167–177
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
