Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;35(3):541-548.
doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.675. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

Lessons from Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Digital Healthcare

Affiliations
Review

Lessons from Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Digital Healthcare

Hun-Sung Kim et al. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020 Sep.

Abstract

We live in a digital world where a variety of wearable medical devices are available. These technologies enable us to measure our health in our daily lives. It is increasingly possible to manage our own health directly through data gathered from these wearable devices. Likewise, healthcare professionals have also been able to indirectly monitor patients' health. Healthcare professionals have accepted that digital technologies will play an increasingly important role in healthcare. Wearable technologies allow better collection of personal medical data, which healthcare professionals can use to improve the quality of healthcare provided to the public. The use of continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) is the most representative and desirable case in the adoption of digital technology in healthcare. Using the case of CGMS and examining its use from the perspective of healthcare professionals, this paper discusses the necessary adjustments required in clinical practices. There is a need for various stakeholders, such as medical staff, patients, industry partners, and policy-makers, to utilize and harness the potential of digital technology.

Keywords: Blood glucose self-monitoring; Delivery of health care; Quality of health care; Wearable electronic devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scheme of the digital healthcare system.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schema of regional-based Digital Health Coordinating Center [13,26].

References

    1. Karinharju KS, Boughey AM, Tweedy SM, Clanchy KM, Trost SG, Gomersall SR. Validity of the Apple Watch® for monitoring push counts in people using manual wheelchairs. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019:1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernando D, Roca S, Sancho J, Alesanco A, Bailon R. Validation of the Apple watch for heart rate variability measurements during relax and mental stress in healthy subjects. Sensors (Basel) 2018;18:2619. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raja JM, Elsakr C, Roman S, Cave B, Pour-Ghaz I, Nanda A, et al. Apple watch, wearables, and heart rhythm: where do we stand? Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim HS, Cho JH, Yoon KH. New directions in chronic disease management. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2015;30:159–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim HS, Kim H, Lee S, Lee KH, Kim JH. Current clinical status of telehealth in Korea: categories, scientific basis, and obstacles. Healthc Inform Res. 2015;21:244–50. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types