Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 26:9:446.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22503.2. eCollection 2020.

Association between categorization of emotionally-charged and neutral visual scenes and parameters of event-related potentials in carriers of different COMT, HTR2A, BDNF gene genotypes

Affiliations

Association between categorization of emotionally-charged and neutral visual scenes and parameters of event-related potentials in carriers of different COMT, HTR2A, BDNF gene genotypes

Elena V Vorobyeva et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to discover the association between parameters of event-related potentials (ERPs) and categorization of images of visual scenes, both emotionally-charged and neutral, in carriers of different genotypes of the COMT, HTR2A, BDNF genes. Methods: Electroencephalogram (EEG) and ERPs were recorded at 128 leads, with two ear referents. Images of different visual scenes were presented to the study participants sequentially on a monitor screen. The participants' task was to examine these images and indicate what emotions (negative, neutral or positive) they elicit. Comparison of event-related potentials was carried out using unpaired Student t-test in EEGLAB toolbox. Results: COMT. A stronger reaction, as reflected in the amplitude of the ERPs, in participants with the recessive homozygous Met/Met genotype was observed on latency around 200 ms to the stimuli, assessed as positive. Carriers of dominant homozygous Val/Val genotype had higher amplitude of 200 ms peak when assessed scene images as either neutral or negative in comparison to other genotypes. Participant with the Val/Met heterozygous genotype had higher amplitude of ERP that Met/Met group on same latency when assessed stimuli as negative. HTR2A . Significant increase in negativity in the parietal-occipital regions revealed in the range of 350-420 ms in participants with the recessive homozygous A/A genotype when choosing any type of assessment, compared to carriers of the heterozygous genotype A/G and the dominant homozygous G/G genotype. BDNF. Participants with Val/Val genotype categorized the visual images more thoroughly, as reflected in greater activation of the parietal-occipital zones and higher amplitude on ERP peak on 190 ms (negative assessment) and 160 ms (neutral assessment) then Val/Met carriers. Conclusions: The COMT, HTR2A, BDNF gene different genotypes are associated with the process of categorizing emotionally charged and neutral visual scenes, and this relationship is reflected in the ERP parameters.

Keywords: BDNF genes polymorphisms.; COMT; Categorization of emotionally-charged and neutral visual scenes; HTR2A; parameters of event-related potentials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Bar graphs and confidence intervals (a = 0.05) for evaluating averaged frequencies of assessment responses to emotional stimuli for participants with different genotypes of the COMT gene.
( A) Negative stimuli, ( B) neutral stimuli and ( C) positive stimuli. MM - Met/Met, VM - Val/Met, VV - Val/Val. Left scale - average response rate in percentage.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the COMT gene in response to negative images.
The ERP wave of the Met/Met subgroup are marked in red, Val/Val in blue, Val/Met in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 200 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally negative, for the Val/Met, Val/Val and Met/Met subgroups of the COMT gene.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the COMT gene in response to the neutral images.
The ERP wave of the Met/Met subgroup are marked in red, Val/Val in blue, Val/Met in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 200 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally neutral, for the Val/Met, Val/Val and Met/Met subgroups of the COMT gene.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the COMT gene in response to the positive images.
The ERP wave of the Met/Met subgroup are marked in red, Val/Val in blue, Val/Met in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 200 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally positive, for the Val/Met, Val/Val and Met/Met subgroups of the COMT gene.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.. Bar graphs and confidence intervals (a = 0.05) for evaluating averaged frequencies of assessment responses to emotional stimuli for participants with different genotypes of the HTR2A gene.
( A) Negative stimuli, ( B) neutral stimuli and ( C) positive stimuli. AA – A/A, GG – G/G, AG – A/G. Left scale - average response rate in percentage.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the HTR2A gene in response to the negative images.
The ERP wave of the A/A subgroup are marked in red, G/G in blue, A/G in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 400 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally negative, for the A/A, A/G and G/G subgroups of the HTR2A gene.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the HTR2A gene in response to the neutral images.
The ERP wave of the A/A subgroup are marked in red, G/G in blue, A/G in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 400 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally neutral, for the A/A, A/G and G/G subgroups of the HTR2A gene.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the HTR2A gene in response to the positive images.
The ERP wave of the A/A subgroup are marked in red, G/G in blue, A/G in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 14.
Figure 14.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 400 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally positive, for the A/A, A/G and G/G subgroups of the HTR2A gene.
Figure 15.
Figure 15.. Bar graphs and confidence intervals (a = 0.05) for evaluating averaged frequencies of assessment responses to emotional stimuli for participants with different genotypes of the BDNF gene.
( A) Negative stimuli, ( B) neutral stimuli and ( C) positive stimuli. VM - Val/Met, VV - Val/Val. Left scale - average response rate in percentage.
Figure 16.
Figure 16.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the BDNF gene in response to the negative images.
The ERP wave of the Val/Met subgroup are marked in red, Val/Val in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 17.
Figure 17.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 190 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally negative, for the Val/Met, Val/Val subgroups of the BDNF gene.
Figure 18.
Figure 18.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the BDNF gene in response to the neutral images.
The ERP wave of the Val/Met subgroup are marked in red, Val/Val in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 19.
Figure 19.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 160 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally neutral, for the Val/Met, Val/Val subgroups of the BDNF gene.
Figure 20.
Figure 20.. Event-related potentials (ERPs) for subgroups with different genotypes of the BDNF gene in response to the positive images.
The ERP wave of the Val/Met subgroup are marked in red, Val/Val in green, and the range with statistically significant differences in gray.
Figure 21.
Figure 21.. Topography of the potentials distribution at a latency of 200 ms when evaluating a stimulus as being emotionally positive, for the Val/Met, Val/Val subgroups of the BDNF gene.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Åberg E, Fandiño-Losada A, Sjöholm LK, et al. : The functional Val158Met polymorphism in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is associated with depression and motivation in men from a Swedish population-based study. J Affect Disord. 2011;129(1–3):158–166. 10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alfimova MV, Golimbet VE, Barkhatova AN, et al. : [The role of genotype-environment interactions in the development of symptoms of anxiety and depression related to the disease burden for family]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2009;109(12):50–54. - PubMed
    1. Alfimova MV, Golimbet VE, Korovaitseva GI, et al. : The Role of the Interaction between the NMDA and Dopamine Receptor Genes in Impaired Recognition of Emotional Expression in Schizophrenia. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology. 2019;49(1):153–158. 10.1007/s11055-018-0709-y - DOI
    1. Chen ZY, Patel PD, Sant G, et al. : Variant Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) (Met66) Alters the Intracellular Trafficking and Activity-Dependent Secretion of Wild-Type BDNF in Neurosecretory Cells and Cortical Neurons. J Neurosci. 2004;24(18):4401–4411. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0348-04.2004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Delorme A, Makeig S: EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134(1):9–21. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types