Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul-Sep;8(3):1-12.
doi: 10.1177/2158244018796412. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

A Comparison of Strategies for Recruiting Teachers Into Survey Panels

Affiliations

A Comparison of Strategies for Recruiting Teachers Into Survey Panels

Michael W Robbins et al. Sage Open. 2018 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

We examine a range of options for recruiting teachers into a nationally representative survey panel. Recruitment strategies considered include a telephone-based approach and the use of promised incentives and pre-incentives of varying amounts and forms. Using a randomized experiment, we evaluate the effectiveness of five separate recruitment strategies and conduct a cost-benefit analysis. Our preferred strategy is one that uses a US$10 gift card as pre-incentive (it yielded a 27% rate of successful recruitment a cost of US$78 per recruited teacher). Statistical comparisons indicate that no other technique was superior to this strategy in terms of recruitment rate or cost-effectiveness. Efforts at refusal conversion after the initial approach were mostly ineffective. A comparison across demographic type characteristics of enrolled panelists and nonrespondents shows no substantial differences for any recruitment strategy considered. Hence, the potential for recruitment-level nonresponse to induce large bias into findings from surveys administered to the panel is minimal.

Keywords: educational research; incentives; response rates; sampling bias; survey methods; survey panels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the study design for recruitment of teachers.

References

    1. Armstrong J. S. (1975). Monetary incentives in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 111-116.
    1. Berry S. H., & Kanouse D. E (1987). Physician response to a mailed survey: An experiment in timing of payment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 102-114.
    1. Callegaro M., Baker R. P., Bethlehem J., Göritz A. S., Krosnick J. A., & Lavrakas P. J (Eds.). (2014). Online panel research: A data quality perspective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
    1. Church A. H. (1993). Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 62-79.
    1. Creighton K. P., King K. E., & Martin E. A (2007). The use of monetary incentives in Census Bureau longitudinal surveys (Survey Methodology Report Series No. 2007–2). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

LinkOut - more resources