Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 1:8:952.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00952. eCollection 2020.

The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts

Affiliations
Review

The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts

Ignacio Sallent et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Bone reconstruction techniques are mainly based on the use of tissue grafts and artificial scaffolds. The former presents well-known limitations, such as restricted graft availability and donor site morbidity, while the latter commonly results in poor graft integration and fixation in the bone, which leads to the unbalanced distribution of loads, impaired bone formation, increased pain perception, and risk of fracture, ultimately leading to recurrent surgeries. In the past decade, research efforts have been focused on the development of innovative bone substitutes that not only provide immediate mechanical support, but also ensure appropriate graft anchoring by, for example, promoting de novo bone tissue formation. From the countless studies that aimed in this direction, only few have made the big jump from the benchtop to the bedside, whilst most have perished along the challenging path of clinical translation. Herein, we describe some clinically successful cases of bone device development, including biological glues, stem cell-seeded scaffolds, and gene-functionalized bone substitutes. We also discuss the ventures that these technologies went through, the hindrances they faced and the common grounds among them, which might have been key for their success. The ultimate objective of this perspective article is to highlight the important aspects of the clinical translation of an innovative idea in the field of bone grafting, with the aim of commercially and clinically informing new research approaches in the sector.

Keywords: bioactive scaffolds; bioadhesives; bone grafting; cell therapies; clinical trials; commercialization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbah S., Delgado L., Azeem A., Fuller K., Shologu N., Keeney M., et al. (2015). Harnessing hierarchical nano- and micro-fabrication technologies for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4 2488–2499. 10.1002/adhm.201500004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abuelnaga M., Elbokle N., Khashaba M. (2018). Evaluation of custom made xenogenic bone grafts in mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation versus particulate bone graft with titanium mesh. Egypt. J. Oral Maxillof. Surg. 9 62–73. 10.21608/omx.2018.19566 - DOI
    1. Adibrad M., Shahabuei M., Sahabi M. (2009). Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on the health status of the supporting tissue around implants supporting overdentures. J. Oral Implantol. 35 232–237. 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-09-00035.1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahrengart L., Törnkvist H., Fornander P., Thorngren K.-G., Pasanen L., Wahlström P., et al. (2002). A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma Nail in 426 fractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 401 209–222. 10.1097/00003086-200208000-00024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amini A. R., Laurencin C. T., Nukavarapu S. P. (2012). Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 40 363–408. 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v40.i5.10 - DOI - PMC - PubMed