Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 18;2(9):e0220.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000220. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Inpatient Mortality According to Level of Respiratory Support Received for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Infection: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Affiliations

Inpatient Mortality According to Level of Respiratory Support Received for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Infection: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Alberto Palazzuoli et al. Crit Care Explor. .

Abstract

Objectives: To describe patients according to the maximum degree of respiratory support received and report their inpatient mortality due to coronavirus disease 2019.

Design: Analysis of patients in the Coracle registry from February 22, 2020, to April 1, 2020.

Setting: Hospitals in the Piedmont, Lombardy, Tuscany, and Lazio regions of Italy.

Patients: Nine-hundred forty-eight patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Among 948 patients, 122 (12.87%) received invasive ventilation, 637 (67.19%) received supplemental oxygen only, and 189 (19.94%) received no respiratory support. The median (quartile 1-quartile 3) age was 65 years (54-76.59 yr), and there was evidence of differential respiratory treatment by decade of life (p = 0.0046); patients greater than 80 years old were generally not intubated. There were 606 men (63.9%) in this study, and they were more likely to receive respiratory support than women (p < 0.0001). The rate of in-hospital death for invasive ventilation recipients was 22.95%, 12.87% for supplemental oxygen recipients, and 7.41% for those who received neither (p = 0.0004). A sensitivity analysis of the 770 patients less than 80 years old revealed a lower, but similar mortality trend (18.02%, 8.10%, 5.23%; p = 0.0008) among the 14.42%, 65.71%, and 19.87% of patients treated with mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen only, or neither. Overall, invasive ventilation recipients who died were significantly older than those who survived (median age: 68.5 yr [60-81.36 yr] vs 62.5 yr [55.52-71 yr]; p = 0.0145).

Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019, 13% received mechanical ventilation, which was associated with a mortality rate of 23%.

Keywords: coronavirus disease 2019; inpatient mortality; invasive ventilation; respiratory support; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; supplemental oxygen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Mojoli received funding from GE Healthcare (fee for lectures), Hamilton Medical (fee for lectures), and Seda Spa (fee for lecture) and disclosed a consultancy agreement between University of Pavia and Hamilton Medical. On behalf of the Coracle registry, for the purpose of this study, no ICU data were retrieved by Drs. Corcione or Palazzo. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Respiratory support received according to age group of patients in Coracle registry hospitalized in Italy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Inpatient survival rates according to age group and respiratory support received of patients in Coracle registry hospitalized in Italy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection

References

    1. Ford P, Foale M. Converting gas-driven ventilators from oxygen to air. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75:821. - PubMed
    1. El Majid B, El Hammoumi A, Motahhir S, et al. Preliminary design of an innovative, simple, and easy-to-build portable ventilator for COVID-19 patients. EuroMediterr J Environ Integr. 2020; 5:23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herrmann J, Fonseca da Cruz A, Hawley ML, et al. Shared ventilation in the era of COVID-19: A theoretical consideration of the dangers and potential solutions. Respir Care. 2020; 65:932–945 - PubMed
    1. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8:475–481 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auld SC, Caridi-Scheible M, Blum JM, et al. ICU and ventilator mortality among critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019. Crit Care Med. 2020; 48:e799–e804 - PMC - PubMed