Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Dec;21(8):1437-1446.
doi: 10.1111/pedi.13129. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Withdrawal of medications leads to worsening of OGTT parameters in youth with impaired glucose tolerance or recently-diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Withdrawal of medications leads to worsening of OGTT parameters in youth with impaired glucose tolerance or recently-diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Tamara S Hannon et al. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The RISE Pediatric Medication Study compared strategies for preserving β-cell function, including a 9-month follow-up after treatment withdrawal to test treatment effect durability.

Objective: Evaluate OGTT measures of glucose and β-cell response through 12 months of intervention and 9 months of medication washout.

Participants: Youth (n = 91) aged 10 to 19 years with BMI ≥85th percentile and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: A multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing insulin glargine for 3 months followed by metformin for 9 months (G→Met) or metformin alone (Met) for 12 months. We report within-group changes from baseline to end of medication intervention (M12), baseline to 9 months post-medication withdrawal (M21), and end of medication (M12) to M21. OGTT C-peptide index [CPI] paired with 1/fasting insulin evaluated β-cell response.

Results: At M12, both treatments were associated with stable fasting glucose (G→Met baseline 6.0 ± 0.1 vs M12 5.9 ± 0.2 mmol/L, P = .62; Met baseline 6.1 ± 0.2 vs M12 6.0 ± 0.2 mmol/L, P = .73) and 2-hour glucose (G→Met baseline 10.2 ± 0.4 vs M12 9.3 ± 0.5 mmol/L, P = .03; Met baseline 10.2 ± 0.4 vs M12 10.6 ± 0.6 mmol/L, P = .88). Following medication withdrawal, fasting glucose worsened (G→Met M21 8.6 ± 1.8, P = .004; Met M21 7.8 ± 0.7 mmol/L, P = .003), as did 2-hour glucose (G→Met M21 13.2 ± 1.4, P = .002; Met M21 13.1 ± 1.2 mmol/L, P = .006), associated with declines in β-cell response.

Conclusions: G→Met and Met were associated with stable glucose measures during 12 months of treatment in youth with IGT or recently diagnosed T2D. Glucose and β-cell response worsened post-medication withdrawal, suggesting treatment must be long-term or alternative treatments pursued.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779375.

Keywords: glucose tolerance; impaired glucose tolerance; insulin glargine; insulin response; insulin secretion; insulin sensitivity; medication; metformin; pediatric; prediabetes; type 2 diabetes; β-cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: S.A.A. and S.E.K. serve as paid consultants on advisory boards for Novo Nordisk. S.E.K. is a member of a steering committee for a Novo Nordisk sponsored clinical trial. S.A.A. is a participant in a Novo Nordisk-sponsored clinical trial. T.A.B. has received research support from Allergan and Apollo Endosurgery. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT Diagram. The glargine followed by metformin group is presented in green boxes; the metformin alone group is presented in brown boxes. $4 participants included in the glargine followed by metformin group at M21 decompensated between Months 15 and 21 and have imputed data for M21 *2 participants included in the metformin alone group decompensated between months 9 and 12, and 1 participant decompensated between months 15 and 21, and have imputed data for M15 and/or M21 as appropriate †10 patients lost interest, 3 were non-compliant with run-in protocol, and 5 had poor iv access precluding studies requiring reliable iv access
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
OGTT glucose, C-peptide and insulin curves by treatment group at baseline (BAS, blue), M06 (purple), M12 (green), M15 (orange) and M21 (red). Data are means ± SEM.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
BMI (panel A), HbA1c (panel B), OGTT fasting glucose (panel C) and 2-hr glucose (panel D) over time, by treatment group (glargine followed by metformin in green; metformin alone in brown). Data are unadjusted means with 95% CI bars. Solid lines represent time on active treatment; dashed lines represent the period following medication withdrawal. Significant within treatment group changes from baseline are denoted with (*) and changes from M12 with (†).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Relationship of OGTT-derived β-cell responses of C-peptide index (CPI) and insulinogenic index (IGI) paired with 1/fasting insulin by intervention group and study visit. Changes are shown from baseline to M06, M12, M15 and M21. The black line depicts the joint relationship between β-cell response and 1/fasting insulin at baseline for the full cohort, with the mean value indicated by the black box with a 0. The dotted lines to boxes show the trajectory of values from baseline to M06, and then to M12 (time of medication withdrawal), and then from M12 to M15 (3 months after medication withdrawal) and then to M21 (9 months after medication withdrawal) for the glargine followed by metformin group (green) and the metformin alone group (brown). The lines to points at M06, M12, M15 and M21 show the average changes between these time points. Values above the bolded baseline line indicate improved β-cell function and values below poorer β-cell function. The ellipses depict the 95% confidence bands around data for each box. Panel A) CPI paired with 1/fasting insulin. Panel B) IGI paired with 1/fasting insulin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2005) Role of insulin secretion and sensitivity in the evolution of type 2 diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program: Effects of lifestyle intervention and metformin. Diabetes 54(8):2404–2414. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346(6):393–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weng J, Li Y, Xu W, Shi L, Zhang Q, Zhu D, et al. (2008) Effect of intensive insulin therapy on beta-cell function and glycaemic control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a multicentre randomised parallelgroup trial. Lancet 371(9626):1753–1760. - PubMed
    1. The RISE Consortium (2014) Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE): Design of studies of beta cell preservation in prediabetes and early type 2 diabetes across the life span. Diabetes Care 37(3):780–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The RISE Consortium (2018) Impact of insulin and metformin versus metformin alone on beta cell function in youth with impaired glucose tolerance or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 41(8):1717–1725. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data