Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2018127.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18127.

Proportion of Female Speakers at Academic Medical Conferences Across Multiple Specialties and Regions

Anuj Arora  1 , Yuvreet Kaur  1 , Fahima Dossa  1 , Rosane Nisenbaum  2 , Darby Little  1 , Nancy N Baxter  1   2   3
Affiliations

Proportion of Female Speakers at Academic Medical Conferences Across Multiple Specialties and Regions

Anuj Arora et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Women in medicine have been underrepresented at medical conferences; however, contributing factors have not been well studied.

Objective: To examine the distribution of invited conference speakers by gender and factors associated with representation of women as speakers.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional analysis used medical conference programs from March 2017 to November 2018 across 20 specialties in 5 regions (Australasia, Canada, Europe, the UK, and the US) that were obtained online or from conference conveners.

Exposures: Gender of invited lecturers, panelists, and planning committee members for each conference based on name or picture and publicly available data on compositions of specialties by gender for included regions.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes included the proportion of female speakers (invited lecturers and panelists), the number of single-gender panels, and the proportion of female speakers compared with the specialties' gender composition. Correlations between the gender composition of conference planning committees and the proportion of female speakers were assessed. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate factors independently associated with the proportion of female speakers at conferences.

Results: A total of 8535 sessions (panels and invited lectures) with 23 440 speakers across 98 conferences were identified. Women accounted for 7064 (30.1%) of speakers; 1981 of 5409 panels (36.6%) consisted of men only, and 363 (6.7%) consisted of women only. The proportion of women speakers varied by region and specialty from 5.8% to 74.5%. In general, specialties with low baseline proportions of women (<20%) had a ratio of female speakers to female specialists greater than 1, whereas specialties with high baseline proportions of women (>40%) had a ratio of female speakers to female specialists less that 1. There was a strong positive correlation between the proportion of women on planning committees and conference representation of female speakers (r = 0.67; P < .001). The association remained statistically significant after controlling for other variables, including the regional gender balance of the specialty (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15; P < .001 for every 10% increase in the proportion of women on the planning committee).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the proportion of female speakers at medical conferences was lower than that of male speakers, and more than one-third of panels were composed of men only. Increasing the number of women on planning committees may help address gender inequities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Percentage of Women as Speakers at Conferences and in Each Specialty
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Bubble Plot of the Ratio of the Proportion of Female Speakers at Each Conference to the Proportion of Female Specialists in Each Respective Specialty by Region
The size of the bubble reflects the size of the ratio between speakers and baseline specialists. A small bubble reflects a low proportion of female speakers relative to the proportion of women in the specialty, and a large bubble reflects a high proportion.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Association Between Gender Balance in Organizing Committees and Speaker Sex Ratio Using the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
The circles represent each conference, and the line indicates the correlation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Ramakrishnan A, Sambuco D, Jagsi R. Women’s participation in the medical profession: insights from experiences in Japan, Scandinavia, Russia, and Eastern Europe. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014;23(11):927-934. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4736 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jefferson L, Bloor K, Maynard A. Women in medicine: historical perspectives and recent trends. Br Med Bull. 2015;114(1):5-15. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldv007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin JL. Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(11):e1003903. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003903 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerull KM, Wahba BM, Goldin LM, et al. . Representation of women in speaking roles at surgical conferences. Am J Surg. 2020;220(1):20-26. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilcox AR, Trooboff SW, Lai CS, Turner PL, Wong SL. Trends in gender representation at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress and the Academic Surgical Congress: a mixed picture of progress. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;229(4):397-403. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.06.002 - DOI - PubMed