Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;14(4):607-614.
doi: 10.14444/7081. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

Postoperative Neurological Complications Following Revision Spine Surgery: A State Inpatient Database Analysis

Aditya Muralidharan  1 , Wesley Shoap  2 , Khaled Al Robaidi  3 , Parthasarathy D Thirumala  3   4
Affiliations

Postoperative Neurological Complications Following Revision Spine Surgery: A State Inpatient Database Analysis

Aditya Muralidharan et al. Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative neurological complications after spine surgery can result in increased mortality and morbidity. Despite the introduction of new spinal implants and surgical technology, reoperation rates have remained stable over recent years. Understanding the reasons for revision (refusion) surgery and the risk of neurological complications can assist in developing more effective screening protocols for repeat surgeries and early detection of potential neurological complications.

Methods: This study was designed and conducted as a retrospective cohort study. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether revision spine surgery increased the risk of postoperative neurological deficits. A secondary objective of the study was to analyze whether deficits following repeat spine surgery increased morbidity and mortality. Data on revision spine procedures were extracted from the California State Inpatient Database for years 2008 to 2011. Patients who developed postoperative neurological deficits were then subdivided into causative procedure: revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, revision posterior cervical fusion, and revision thoracolumbar fusion. These data were then used to calculate the total incidence of postoperative neurological deficits following each type of procedure. The impact of neurological deficits on in-hospital morbidity following revision procedures was also calculated.

Results: Revision procedures accounted for 5.84% of all spine procedures in a total of 7645 patients. Among these patients, 67 patients (0.88%) developed a postoperative neurological deficit with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.20-2.00, P < .05). When using individuals with no neurological deficit as the reference group, the odds of morbidity were 5.3 (95% CI, 3.15-9.00, P < .05) in those who sustained neurological deficit following revision procedure.

Conclusions/clinical relevance: This study exposes the increased risk of postoperative neurological complications in revision spine surgeries. In response, further studies are needed to evaluate the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to reduce this risk.

Keywords: deficits; intraoperative; monitoring; morbidity; neurological; neurophysiological; postoperative; revision; spine; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures and COI: The authors received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2440–2449. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01476. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thirumala P, Zhou J, Natarjan P, et al. Postoperative neurologic complications during spinal fusion surgery: incidence and trends. Spine J. 2017;17:1611–1624. - PubMed
    1. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K. Major intraoperative neurologic deficits in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients: incidence and etiology at one institution. Spine. 1998;23:8. - PubMed
    1. Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine. 2012;37:67–76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marawar S, Girardi FP, Sama AA, et al. National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures. Spine. 2010;35:1454–1459. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bef3cb. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources