Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;1485(1):3-21.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.14495. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Calcium-fortified foods in public health programs: considerations for implementation

Affiliations
Review

Calcium-fortified foods in public health programs: considerations for implementation

Cristina Palacios et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Low calcium intake is common worldwide and can result in nutritional rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. Calcium-fortified foods could improve calcium intake. However, there is limited calcium fortification experience, with technical and practical issues that may hamper its adoption. The objective of this landscape review is to summarize these issues to help policymakers guide the planning and design of calcium fortification as a public health strategy. One challenge is the low bioavailability of calcium salts (∼20-40%); thus, large amounts need to be added to food to have a meaningful impact. Solubility is important when fortifying liquids and acidic foods. Calcium salts could change the flavor, color, and appearance of the food and may account for 70-90% of the total fortification cost. Safety is key to avoid exceeding the recommended intake; so the amount of added calcium should be based on the target calcium intake and the gap between inadequate and adequate levels. Monitoring includes the quality of the fortified food and population calcium intake using dietary assessment methods. Calcium fortification should follow regulations, implemented in an intersectorial way, and be informed by the right to health and equity. This information may help guide and plan this public health strategy.

Keywords: calcium; fortification; implementation; program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Palacios, C. , Hofmeyr G.J., Cormick G., et al 2020. Current calcium fortification experiences: a review. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1484: 55–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cormick, G. , Betrán A., Romero I., et al 2019. Global inequities in dietary calcium intake during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG 126: 444–456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heaney, R.P. 2000. Calcium, dairy products and osteoporosis. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 19: 83S–99S. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) . 2011. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
    1. Villar, J. , Abdel‐Aleem H., Merialdi M., et al 2006. World Health Organization randomized trial of calcium supplementation among low calcium intake pregnant women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 194: 639–649. - PubMed

Publication types