Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Sep 24;56(10):496.
doi: 10.3390/medicina56100496.

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Successfully Managed to Term: When the Patient Is Determined to Keep the Pregnancy

Affiliations
Case Reports

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Successfully Managed to Term: When the Patient Is Determined to Keep the Pregnancy

Ranko Kutlesic et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy, defined as the implantation of the gestational sac at the uterine incision scar of the previous cesarean section. This condition is associated with severe maternal and fetal/neonatal complications, including severe bleeding, rupture of the uterus, fetal demise, or preterm delivery. In view of these, early diagnosis allows the option of termination of pregnancy. In this case report, we present a patient with a cesarean scar pregnancy who was diagnosed at the sixth week of gestation but declined early termination of the pregnancy and was managed to the 38th week. Placenta previa was confirmed in the second trimester. A planned cesarean section was performed that resulted in the birth of a live full-term neonate. Intraoperatively, placenta percreta was diagnosed, and due to uncontrollable bleeding, a hysterectomy was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. In cases where an early diagnosis of CSP is made, women should be counseled that this will almost certainly evolve to placenta previa, and the associated risks should be explained. Close follow-up of CSP is mandatory if expectant management is selected. Further studies are needed for definitive conclusions and to determine the risks of expectant management.

Keywords: High-Risk; cesarean section; complication; ectopic; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transvaginal ultrasound examination of a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) at the sixth postmenstrual week showing an empty uterine cavity with a 9 mm endometrial strip (E) and a triangular gestational sac (10 mm in diameter) located within the isthmic part of the anterior uterine wall filling the niche of the scar, with a yolk sac inside covered with a thin myometrial layer 2 mm in diameter (arrow); the cervical channel (Cx) is empty; according to the presence of cross over sign (COS), this gestational sac could be identified as COS-1; according to the implantation of the gestation sac it is implanted in the niche of the scar (ultrasound sign reported by Kaelin Agten et al.); according to the position of the center of the gestational sac it could be classified as implantation bellow the uterine midline (classification proposed by Timor-Tritsch et al.) (explanation in Discussion).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cesarean scar pregnancy: A gestational sac (GS) containing an embryo with heart action and a crown–rump length (CRL) of 9.6 mm, which corresponded to 7 weeks and 1 day of gestation.

References

    1. Zosmer N., Fuller J., Shaikh H., Johns J., Ross J.A. Natural history of early first-trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;46:367–375. doi: 10.1002/uog.14775. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jauniaux E., Collins S., Burton G.J. Placenta accreta spectrum: Pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;218:75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silver R.M., Landon M.B., Rouse D.J., Leveno K.J., Spong C.Y., Thom E.A., Moawad A.H., Caritis S.N., Harper M., Wapner R.J., et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006;107:1226–1232. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jurkovic D., Hillaby K., Woelfer B., Lawrence A., Salim R., Elson C.J. First trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;21:220–227. doi: 10.1002/uog.56. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flood K.M., Said S., Geary M., Robson M., Fitzpatrick C., Malone F.D. Changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy over the last 4 decades. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;200:632.e1–632.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types