Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 24;17(19):6983.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17196983.

Eco-Efficiency and Private Firms' Relationships with Heterogeneous Public Stakeholders in China

Jiawen Chen  1 , Linlin Liu  2
Affiliations

Eco-Efficiency and Private Firms' Relationships with Heterogeneous Public Stakeholders in China

Jiawen Chen et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Private firms have been struggling to simultaneously achieve both environmental and economic goals. The concept of eco-efficiency captures the extent to which firms gain competitiveness through environmental management. Based on stakeholder salience theory and organizational learning theory, this study proposes that relationship with public stakeholders can hinder or promote private firms' eco-efficiency. Our findings showed that firm eco-efficiency is reduced by a relationship with the government but is enhanced by relationships with non-governmental organizations (NGOs). This study also found that the effects on eco-efficiency of a firm's relationship with public stakeholders are contingent on firm size. The findings of this study shed light on the organizational learning perspective of eco-efficiency and multi-stakeholder management by theoretically and empirically differentiating the effects on firm eco-efficiency of relationships with the government and NGOs.

Keywords: eco-efficiency; organizational learning; stakeholder relationship; stakeholder salience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Koskela M., Vehmas J. Defining Eco-efficiency: A Case Study on the Finnish Forest Industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2012;21:546–566. doi: 10.1002/bse.741. - DOI
    1. Caiado R.G.G., de Freitas D.R., Mattos L.V., Quelhas O.L.G., Leal F.W. Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency-A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017;165:890–904. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166. - DOI
    1. Helminen R.R. Developing tangible measures for eco-efficiency: The case of the Finnish and Swedish pulp and paper industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2000;9:196–210. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(200005/06)9:3<196::AID-BSE240>3.0.CO;2-O. - DOI
    1. Russo M.V. Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2009;18:307–319. doi: 10.1002/bse.587. - DOI
    1. Kabongo J.D., Boiral O. Doing More with Less: Building Dynamic Capabilities for Eco-Efficiency. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017;26:956–971. doi: 10.1002/bse.1958. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources