Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 24;9(10):1357.
doi: 10.3390/foods9101357.

Game Meat Consumption-Conscious Choice or Just a Game?

Affiliations

Game Meat Consumption-Conscious Choice or Just a Game?

Katarzyna Niewiadomska et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Game meat is constantly present on the European meat market, but a limited number of consumers are interested in its consumption. Considering the unique features of wild animal meat, we should explore what pushes consumers to include it in their diet. To identify the motives determining the choice of game meat, a quantitative survey based on the computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) method was conducted among 450 participants. The statistical analysis based on the logistic regression model allowed us to assess the significance of emotional motives leading to game eating and to investigate the importance of the rational motives related to the quality attributes of game for consumers. It was shown that rational motives influence the consumers' choice more than emotional factors, while the most important motives are connected with healthcare issues. Consumers, for whom the crucial attributes of quality are taste, nutritional value, and low fat content, constitute a group that might more often include game in their diet in the future. Among the emotional motives, the familiarity, described as a feeling of knowing the product, also has a statistically significant impact on the consumers' choice. The results obtained may be useful for academic theoreticians and market experts as well.

Keywords: choice motives; game meat; quality attributes; quality perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The founders played no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

    1. Pearcey S.M., Zhan G.Q. A comparative study of American and Chinese college students’ motives for food choice. Appetite. 2018;123:325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Engel J.F., Blackwell R.D., Miniard P.W. Consumer Behavior. The Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace College Publishers; Fort Worth, TX, USA: 1995.
    1. Pula K., Parks C.D., Ross C.F. Regulatory focus and food choice motives. Prevention orientation associated with mood, convenience, and familiarity. Appetite. 2014;78:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babicz-Zielińska E. Role of psychological factors in food choice—A review. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2006;15:379–384.
    1. Acebron L.B., Dopico D.C. The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Qual. Prefer. 2000;11:229–238. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00059-2. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources