Safety and 30-day outcomes of tracheostomy for COVID-19: a prospective observational cohort study
- PMID: 32988602
- PMCID: PMC7455111
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.023
Safety and 30-day outcomes of tracheostomy for COVID-19: a prospective observational cohort study
Abstract
Background: The role of tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear, with several consensus guidelines advising against this practice. We developed both a dedicated airway team and coordinated education programme to facilitate ward management of tracheostomised COVID-19 patients. Here, we report outcomes in the first 100 COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy at our institution.
Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients confirmed to have COVID-19 who required mechanical ventilation at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. The primary outcome measure was 30-day survival, accounting for severe organ dysfunction (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health [APACHE]-II score>17). Secondary outcomes included duration of ventilation, ICU stay, and healthcare workers directly involved in tracheostomy care acquiring COVID-19.
Results: A total of 164 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the ICU between March 9, 2020 and April 21, 2020. A total of 100 patients (mean [standard deviation] age: 55 [12] yr; 29% female) underwent tracheostomy; 64 (age: 57 [14] yr; 25% female) did not undergo tracheostomy. Despite similar APACHE-II scores, 30-day survival was higher in 85/100 (85%) patients after tracheostomy, compared with 27/64 (42%) non-tracheostomised patients {relative risk: 3.9 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.3-6.4); P<0.0001}. In patients with APACHE-II scores ≥17, 68/100 (68%) tracheotomised patients survived, compared with 12/64 (19%) non-tracheotomised patients (P<0.001). Tracheostomy within 14 days of intubation was associated with shorter duration of ventilation (mean difference: 6.0 days [95% CI: 3.1-9.0]; P<0.0001) and ICU stay (mean difference: 6.7 days [95% CI: 3.7-9.6]; P<0.0001). No healthcare workers developed COVID-19.
Conclusion: Independent of the severity of critical illness from COVID-19, 30-day survival was higher and ICU stay shorter in patients receiving tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy appears to be safe in COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19; ICU; SARS-CoV-2; safety; tracheostomy.
Copyright © 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures

Comment in
-
Tracheostomy for COVID-19: business as usual?Br J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;125(6):867-871. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.048. Epub 2020 Sep 3. Br J Anaesth. 2020. PMID: 32951840 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center Coronavirus COVID-19 global cases by the center for systems science and engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html Available from:
-
- Intensive care national audit and research centre. COVID-19 report. Available from: https://www.icnarc.org/DataServices/Attachments/Download/96b455be-059e-e.... [Accessed 14 July 2020].
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous