Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;23(2):280-288.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00976-z. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

Identifying rare, medically relevant variation via population-based genomic screening in Alabama: opportunities and pitfalls

Affiliations
Free article

Identifying rare, medically relevant variation via population-based genomic screening in Alabama: opportunities and pitfalls

Kevin M Bowling et al. Genet Med. 2021 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and specificity of population-based genomic screening in Alabama.

Methods: The Alabama Genomic Health Initiative (AGHI) has enrolled and evaluated 5369 participants for the presence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants using the Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA), with validation of all P/LP variants via Sanger sequencing in a CLIA-certified laboratory before return of results.

Results: Among 131 variants identified by the GSA that were evaluated by Sanger sequencing, 67 (51%) were false positives (FP). For 39 of the 67 FP variants, a benign/likely benign variant was present at or near the targeted P/LP variant. Variants detected within African American individuals were significantly enriched for FPs, likely due to a higher rate of nontargeted alternative alleles close to array-targeted P/LP variants.

Conclusion: In AGHI, we have implemented an array-based process to screen for highly penetrant genetic variants in actionable disease genes. We demonstrate the need for clinical validation of array-identified variants in direct-to-consumer or population testing, especially for diverse populations.

Keywords: clinically actionable; diverse population; false positive; genotyping array; population screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • A state-based approach to genomics for rare disease and population screening.
    East KM, Kelley WV, Cannon A, Cochran ME, Moss IP, May T, Nakano-Okuno M, Sodeke SO, Edberg JC, Cimino JJ, Fouad M, Curry WA, Hurst ACE, Bowling KM, Thompson ML, Bebin EM, Johnson RD; AGHI Consortium; Cooper GM, Might M, Barsh GS, Korf BR. East KM, et al. Genet Med. 2021 Apr;23(4):777-781. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01034-4. Epub 2020 Nov 27. Genet Med. 2021. PMID: 33244164 Free PMC article.
  • Medical and psychosocial outcomes of state-funded population genomic screening.
    Cannon A, McMillan O, Kelley WV, East KM, Cochran ME, Miskell EL, Moss IP, Garner-Duckworth S, Redden DT, Might M, Barsh GS, Korf BR. Cannon A, et al. Clin Genet. 2023 Oct;104(4):434-442. doi: 10.1111/cge.14394. Epub 2023 Jun 20. Clin Genet. 2023. PMID: 37340305 Free PMC article.
  • The burden of pathogenic variants in clinically actionable genes in a founder population.
    Lynch MT, Maloney KA, Pollin TI, Streeten EA, Xu H; Regeneron Genetics Center; Shuldiner AR, Van Hout CV, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Mitchell BD. Lynch MT, et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2021 Nov;185(11):3476-3484. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62472. Epub 2021 Aug 31. Am J Med Genet A. 2021. PMID: 34467620
  • Genomic medicine and risk prediction across the disease spectrum.
    Kotze MJ, Lückhoff HK, Peeters AV, Baatjes K, Schoeman M, van der Merwe L, Grant KA, Fisher LR, van der Merwe N, Pretorius J, van Velden DP, Myburgh EJ, Pienaar FM, van Rensburg SJ, Yako YY, September AV, Moremi KE, Cronje FJ, Tiffin N, Bouwens CS, Bezuidenhout J, Apffelstaedt JP, Hough FS, Erasmus RT, Schneider JW. Kotze MJ, et al. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015;52(3):120-37. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2014.997930. Epub 2015 Jan 19. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015. PMID: 25597499 Review.
  • Functional Assays to Screen and Dissect Genomic Hits: Doubling Down on the National Investment in Genomic Research.
    Musunuru K, Bernstein D, Cole FS, Khokha MK, Lee FS, Lin S, McDonald TV, Moskowitz IP, Quertermous T, Sankaran VG, Schwartz DA, Silverman EK, Zhou X, Hasan AAK, Luo XJ. Musunuru K, et al. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Apr;11(4):e002178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.118.002178. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018. PMID: 29654098 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Clayton EW. Be ready to talk with parents about direct-to-consumer genetic testing. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:117–118. - DOI
    1. Regalado A. More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. 2019. https://www.technologyreview.com . Accessed 15 June 2020.
    1. Jonas MC, et al. Physician experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Kaiser Permanente. J Pers Med. 2019;9:47. - DOI
    1. Moscarello T, et al. Direct-to-consumer raw genetic data and third-party interpretation services: more burden than bargain? Genet Med. 2019;21:539–541. - DOI
    1. Wang C, et al. Consumer use and response to online third-party raw DNA interpretation services. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018;6:35–43. - DOI

Publication types