Identifying rare, medically relevant variation via population-based genomic screening in Alabama: opportunities and pitfalls
- PMID: 32989269
- DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-00976-z
Identifying rare, medically relevant variation via population-based genomic screening in Alabama: opportunities and pitfalls
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and specificity of population-based genomic screening in Alabama.
Methods: The Alabama Genomic Health Initiative (AGHI) has enrolled and evaluated 5369 participants for the presence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants using the Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA), with validation of all P/LP variants via Sanger sequencing in a CLIA-certified laboratory before return of results.
Results: Among 131 variants identified by the GSA that were evaluated by Sanger sequencing, 67 (51%) were false positives (FP). For 39 of the 67 FP variants, a benign/likely benign variant was present at or near the targeted P/LP variant. Variants detected within African American individuals were significantly enriched for FPs, likely due to a higher rate of nontargeted alternative alleles close to array-targeted P/LP variants.
Conclusion: In AGHI, we have implemented an array-based process to screen for highly penetrant genetic variants in actionable disease genes. We demonstrate the need for clinical validation of array-identified variants in direct-to-consumer or population testing, especially for diverse populations.
Keywords: clinically actionable; diverse population; false positive; genotyping array; population screening.
Similar articles
-
A state-based approach to genomics for rare disease and population screening.Genet Med. 2021 Apr;23(4):777-781. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01034-4. Epub 2020 Nov 27. Genet Med. 2021. PMID: 33244164 Free PMC article.
-
Medical and psychosocial outcomes of state-funded population genomic screening.Clin Genet. 2023 Oct;104(4):434-442. doi: 10.1111/cge.14394. Epub 2023 Jun 20. Clin Genet. 2023. PMID: 37340305 Free PMC article.
-
The burden of pathogenic variants in clinically actionable genes in a founder population.Am J Med Genet A. 2021 Nov;185(11):3476-3484. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62472. Epub 2021 Aug 31. Am J Med Genet A. 2021. PMID: 34467620
-
Genomic medicine and risk prediction across the disease spectrum.Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015;52(3):120-37. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2014.997930. Epub 2015 Jan 19. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015. PMID: 25597499 Review.
-
Functional Assays to Screen and Dissect Genomic Hits: Doubling Down on the National Investment in Genomic Research.Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Apr;11(4):e002178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.118.002178. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018. PMID: 29654098 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening.Front Genet. 2022 Oct 24;13:893832. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.893832. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2022. PMID: 36353115 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing analytical validity of BeadChip array genotype data by comparison to whole-genome sequence and standard benchmark datasets.BMC Med Genomics. 2022 Mar 14;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12920-022-01199-8. BMC Med Genomics. 2022. PMID: 35287663 Free PMC article.
-
Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing.Genet Med. 2023 Aug;25(8):100884. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100884. Epub 2023 May 6. Genet Med. 2023. PMID: 37161864 Free PMC article.
-
Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Jan 13:2023.01.12.523654. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.12.523654. bioRxiv. 2023. Update in: Genet Med. 2023 Aug;25(8):100884. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100884. PMID: 36711854 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Returning actionable genomic results in a research biobank: Analytic validity, clinical implementation, and resource utilization.Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Dec 2;108(12):2224-2237. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 8. Am J Hum Genet. 2021. PMID: 34752750 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Clayton EW. Be ready to talk with parents about direct-to-consumer genetic testing. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:117–118. - DOI
-
- Regalado A. More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. 2019. https://www.technologyreview.com . Accessed 15 June 2020.
-
- Jonas MC, et al. Physician experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Kaiser Permanente. J Pers Med. 2019;9:47. - DOI
-
- Moscarello T, et al. Direct-to-consumer raw genetic data and third-party interpretation services: more burden than bargain? Genet Med. 2019;21:539–541. - DOI
-
- Wang C, et al. Consumer use and response to online third-party raw DNA interpretation services. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018;6:35–43. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous