Identifying rare, medically relevant variation via population-based genomic screening in Alabama: opportunities and pitfalls
- PMID: 32989269
- DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-00976-z
Identifying rare, medically relevant variation via population-based genomic screening in Alabama: opportunities and pitfalls
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and specificity of population-based genomic screening in Alabama.
Methods: The Alabama Genomic Health Initiative (AGHI) has enrolled and evaluated 5369 participants for the presence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants using the Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA), with validation of all P/LP variants via Sanger sequencing in a CLIA-certified laboratory before return of results.
Results: Among 131 variants identified by the GSA that were evaluated by Sanger sequencing, 67 (51%) were false positives (FP). For 39 of the 67 FP variants, a benign/likely benign variant was present at or near the targeted P/LP variant. Variants detected within African American individuals were significantly enriched for FPs, likely due to a higher rate of nontargeted alternative alleles close to array-targeted P/LP variants.
Conclusion: In AGHI, we have implemented an array-based process to screen for highly penetrant genetic variants in actionable disease genes. We demonstrate the need for clinical validation of array-identified variants in direct-to-consumer or population testing, especially for diverse populations.
Keywords: clinically actionable; diverse population; false positive; genotyping array; population screening.
References
-
- Clayton EW. Be ready to talk with parents about direct-to-consumer genetic testing. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:117–118. - DOI
-
- Regalado A. More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. 2019. https://www.technologyreview.com . Accessed 15 June 2020.
-
- Jonas MC, et al. Physician experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Kaiser Permanente. J Pers Med. 2019;9:47. - DOI
-
- Moscarello T, et al. Direct-to-consumer raw genetic data and third-party interpretation services: more burden than bargain? Genet Med. 2019;21:539–541. - DOI
-
- Wang C, et al. Consumer use and response to online third-party raw DNA interpretation services. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018;6:35–43. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
