Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Oct 1;49(5):1637-1646.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa144.

Emulating a target trial in case-control designs: an application to statins and colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Emulating a target trial in case-control designs: an application to statins and colorectal cancer

Barbra A Dickerman et al. Int J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Previous case-control studies have reported a strong association between statin use and lower cancer risk. It is unclear whether this association reflects a benefit of statins or is the result of design decisions that cannot be mapped to a (hypothetical) target trial (that would answer the question of interest).

Methods: We outlined the protocol of a target trial to estimate the effect of statins on colorectal cancer incidence among adults with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol below 5 mmol/L. We then emulated the target trial using linked electronic health records of 752 469 eligible UK adults (CALIBER 1999-2016) under both a cohort design and a case-control sampling of the cohort. We used pooled logistic regression to estimate intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects of statins on colorectal cancer, with adjustment for baseline and time-varying risk factors via inverse-probability weighting. Finally, we compared our case-control effect estimates with those obtained using previous case-control procedures.

Results: Over the 6-year follow-up, 3596 individuals developed colorectal cancer. Estimated intention-to-treat and per-protocol hazard ratios were 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 1.16) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.12), respectively. As expected, adequate case-control sampling yielded the same estimates. By contrast, previous case-control analytical approaches yielded estimates that appeared strongly protective (odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.91, for ≥5 vs. <5 years of statin use).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates how to explicitly emulate a target trial using case-control data to reduce discrepancies between observational and randomized trial evidence. This approach may inform future case-control analyses for comparative effectiveness research.

Keywords: Case-control; causal inference; comparative effectiveness; electronic health records; target trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for selection of eligible individuals from CALIBER when emulating a target trial of statin therapy and colorectal cancer risk, 1999–2016
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of statin exposure among cases and controls under no survival requirement (A) and a 3-month survival requirement (B) from the time of selection, and proportions of individuals lost to various causes (C). In addition, 6847 surviving controls who were classified as having <5 years of statin use under no survival requirement were re-classified as having ≥5 years of statin use under the 3-month survival requirement

References

    1. Hernán MA, Robins JM. Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not available. Am J Epidemiol 2016;183:758–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernán MA, Sauer BC, Hernandez-Diaz S, Platt R, Shrier I. Specifying a target trial prevents immortal time bias and other self-inflicted injuries in observational analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;79:70–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schneeweiss S, Suissa S. Discussion of Schuemie et al: “A plea to stop using the case-control design in retrospective database studies”. Stat Med 2019;38:4209–12. - PubMed
    1. Miettinen O. Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:226–35. - PubMed
    1. Graaf MR, Beiderbeck AB, Egberts AC, Richel DJ, Guchelaar HJ. The risk of cancer in users of statins. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2388–94. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances