Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;65(8):1477-1484.
doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01488-y. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Physical activity barriers according to social stratification in Europe

Affiliations

Physical activity barriers according to social stratification in Europe

Antonio Moreno-Llamas et al. Int J Public Health. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To analyse relationships of social stratification on physical activity (PA) prevalence and barriers in the European population.

Methods: Data were retrieved from Eurobarometer 88.4, a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2017 with 28,031 over 15-year-old inhabitants of the European Union. PA prevalence was calculated along with the probability to be physically inactive by social stratification. Logistic regressions were run in the inactive population to show the social class effect on each barrier adjusted by sociodemographic factors employing a propensity score matched method.

Results: Low social class presented higher inactivity prevalence (43.11%), whilst the high social class reported the lowest prevalence (23.30%). Also, the low (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.47-0.58) and middle (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.64-0.79) social classes were less likely to be active compared to high social class. In the inactive population, the low social class had mostly higher odds to report each barrier.

Conclusions: Social class is a relevant factor for low PA, with more barriers in the lower social classes. Public health institutions should implement strategies on more influential PA barriers and disadvantaged social groups.

Keywords: Barriers; Lifestyle; Physical activity; Social class; Social determinants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Physical activity prevalence across social stratification in European Union-28; I–II social class represent high social class (n = 2382), III–IV represent middle social class (n = 12,751) and V–VII low social class (n = 11,158), 2017 Eurobarometer
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of physical activity barriers among high (blue), middle (orange) and low (brown) social class by gender in inactive European population (n = 9829), European Union-28, 2017 Eurobarometer (colour figure online)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Physical activity barriers in middle (orange) and low (brown) social class by gender in inactive European population (n = 9829); Results are presented as Odds ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals (base 10 logarithmic scale). Reference group was high social class, Europe Union-28, 2017 Eurobarometer (colour figure online)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Añez R, et al. Barriers to physical activity among Brazilian elderly women from different socioeconomic status: a focus-group study. J Phys Act Heal. 2011;8:126–132. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.1.126. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380:258–271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cerin E, Leslie E, Sugiyama T, Owen N. Perceived barriers to leisure-time physical activity in adults: an ecological perspective. J Phys Act Heal. 2010;7:451–459. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.4.451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan TW, Goldthorpe JH. Class and status: the conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. Am Sociol Rev. 2007;72:512–532. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200402. - DOI
    1. Chinn DJ, White M, Harland J, et al. Barriers to physical activity and socioeconomic position: implications for health promotion. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:191–192. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.3.191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed