Distortion-free 3D diffusion imaging of the prostate using a multishot diffusion-prepared phase-cycled acquisition and dictionary matching
- PMID: 32989765
- DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28527
Distortion-free 3D diffusion imaging of the prostate using a multishot diffusion-prepared phase-cycled acquisition and dictionary matching
Abstract
Purpose: To achieve three-dimensional (3D) distortion-free apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for prostate imaging using a multishot diffusion prepared-gradient echo (msDP-GRE) sequence and ADC dictionary matching.
Methods: The msDP-GRE sequence is combined with a 3D Cartesian, centric k-space trajectory with center oversampling. Oversampled k-space center averaging and phase cycling are used to address motion- and eddy current-induced magnitude corruption. Extended-phase-graph (EPG) simulations and ADC dictionary matching are used to compensate for T1 effects. To shorten the acquisition time, each volume is undersampled by a factor of two and reconstructed using iterative sensitivity encoding. The proposed approach is characterized using simulations and validated in a kiwifruit phantom, comparing the msDP-GRE ADC maps obtained using both standard monoexponential fitting and dictionary matching with the clinical standard single-shot diffusion weighted-echo planar imaging (ssDW-EPI) ADC. Initial in vivo feasibility is tested in three healthy subjects, and geometric distortion is compared with anatomical T2 -weighted-turbo spin echo.
Results: In the kiwifruit phantom experiment, the signal magnitude could be recovered using k-space center averaging and phase cycling. No statistically significant difference was observed in the ADC values estimated using msDP-GRE with dictionary matching and clinical standard DW-EPI (P < .05). The in vivo prostate msDP-GRE scans were free of geometric distortion caused by off-resonance susceptibility, and the ADC values in the prostate were in agreement with values found in the published literature.
Conclusion: Nondistorted 3D ADC maps of the prostate can be achieved using a msDP sequence and dictionary matching.
Keywords: 3T magnetic resonance imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient mapping; dictionary matching; diffusion; prostate cancer imaging; quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.
© 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
3D distortion-free, reduced FOV diffusion-prepared gradient echo at 3 T.Magn Reson Med. 2025 Apr;93(4):1471-1483. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30357. Epub 2024 Oct 27. Magn Reson Med. 2025. PMID: 39462469 Free PMC article.
-
Accelerated 3D T2 mapping with dictionary-based matching for prostate imaging.Magn Reson Med. 2019 Mar;81(3):1795-1805. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27540. Epub 2018 Oct 28. Magn Reson Med. 2019. PMID: 30368900
-
Distortion-free imaging: A double encoding method (DIADEM) combined with multiband imaging for rapid distortion-free high-resolution diffusion imaging on a compact 3T with high-performance gradients.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jan;51(1):296-310. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26792. Epub 2019 May 20. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31111581 Free PMC article.
-
Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.Invest Radiol. 2015 May;50(5):309-21. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000129. Invest Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25612144
-
Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Modern Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Sequences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.Invest Radiol. 2018 Apr;53(4):200-206. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000429. Invest Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29116960
Cited by
-
Quantitative diffusion MRI in prostate cancer: Image quality, what we can measure and how it improves clinical assessment.Eur J Radiol. 2023 Oct;167:111066. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111066. Epub 2023 Aug 25. Eur J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37651828 Free PMC article. Review.
-
3D distortion-free, reduced FOV diffusion-prepared gradient echo at 3 T.Magn Reson Med. 2025 Apr;93(4):1471-1483. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30357. Epub 2024 Oct 27. Magn Reson Med. 2025. PMID: 39462469 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 Update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76:340-351.
-
- Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. PI-RADS prostate imaging - Reporting and data system: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016;69:16-40.
-
- Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): A paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;6736:1-8.
-
- Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1767-1777.
-
- Rouvière O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R, et al. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): A prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet. 2019;20:100-109.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources