Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;26(6):515-522.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.19507.

Tubular gastric adenocarcinoma: machine learning-based CT texture analysis for predicting lymphovascular and perineural invasion

Affiliations

Tubular gastric adenocarcinoma: machine learning-based CT texture analysis for predicting lymphovascular and perineural invasion

Aytül Hande Yardımcı et al. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) are associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancers. In this work, we aimed to investigate the potential role of computed tomography (CT) texture analysis in predicting LVI and PNI in patients with tubular gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) using a machine learning (ML) approach.

Methods: Sixty-eight patients who underwent total gastrectomy with curative (R0) resection and D2-lymphadenectomy were included in this retrospective study. Texture features were extracted from the portal venous phase CT images. Dimension reduction was first done with a reproducibility analysis by two radiologists. Then, a feature selection algorithm was used to further reduce the high-dimensionality of the radiomic data. Training and test splits were created with 100 random samplings. ML-based classifications were done using adaptive boosting, k-nearest neighbors, Naive Bayes, neural network, random forest, stochastic gradient descent, support vector machine, and decision tree. Predictive performance of the ML algorithms was mainly evaluated using the mean area under the curve (AUC) metric.

Results: Among 271 texture features, 150 features had excellent reproducibility, which were included in the further feature selection process. Dimension reduction steps yielded five texture features for LVI and five for PNI. Considering all eight ML algorithms, mean AUC and accuracy ranges for predicting LVI were 0.777-0.894 and 76%-81.5%, respectively. For predicting PNI, mean AUC and accuracy ranges were 0.482-0.754 and 54%-68.2%, respectively. The best performances for predicting LVI and PNI were achieved with the random forest and Naive Bayes algorithms, respectively.

Conclusion: ML-based CT texture analysis has a potential for predicting LVI and PNI of the tubular GACs. Overall, the method was more successful in predicting LVI than PNI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Technical study pipeline. SMOTE, synthetic minority oversampling technique.
Figure 2. a, b
Figure 2. a, b
Segmentation technique. Using a single axial slice of the portal venous phase CT (a), tumor segmentation (b) is done manually along the whole and the largest outer margin of gastric adenocarcinoma. The contour of the segmentation was shrunk to avoid the possible inclusion of perigastric and intragastric areas.
Figure 3. a, b
Figure 3. a, b
The heat map shows the distribution of normalized texture feature values selected for lymphovascular (a) and perineural (b) invasion status.
Figure 4. a, b
Figure 4. a, b
Distribution of the selected texture features in two-dimensional space considering the classes, that is, the presence and absence of the lymphovascular (a) and perineural (b) invasion. Please refer to Table 3 for actual feature names.
Figure 5. a, b
Figure 5. a, b
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the models for predicting lymphovascular (a) and perineural (b) invasion. SVM, support vector machine; Adaboost, adaptive boosting; SGD, stochastic gradient descent; k-NN, k-nearest neighbors.
Figure 6. a, b
Figure 6. a, b
Calibration plots show predicted and actual probability (observed average) of the machine learning models for predicting lymphovascular (a) and perineural (b) invasion. SVM, support vector machine; Adaboost, adaptive boosting; SGD, stochastic gradient descent; k-NN, k-nearest neighbors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hwang J-E, Hong J-Y, Kim JE, et al. Prognostic significance of the concomitant existence of lymphovascular and perineural invasion in locally advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:541–546. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nikberg M, Chabok A, Letocha H, Kindler C, Glimelius B, Smedh K. Lymphovascular and perineural invasion in stage II rectal cancer: a report from the Swedish colorectal cancer registry. Acta Oncol Stockh Swed. 2016;55:1418–1424. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1230274. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hsu C-P, Chuang C-Y, Hsu P-K, et al. Lymphovascular invasion as the major prognostic factor in node-negative esophageal cancer after primary esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2020;24:1459–1468. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04310-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dobriţoiu M, Stepan AE, Vere CC, Simionescu CE. Evaluation of gastric carcinomas histological patterns in relation to tumors aggressiveness parameters. Curr Health Sci J. 2018;44:342–346. - PMC - PubMed