Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e21204.
doi: 10.2196/21204.

Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study

Elia Gabarron  1 , Dillys Larbi  1 , Enrique Dorronzoro  2 , Per Erlend Hasvold  3 , Rolf Wynn  4 , Eirik Årsand  1   5
Affiliations
Observational Study

Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study

Elia Gabarron et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Diabetes patient associations and diabetes-specific patient groups around the world are present on social media. Although active participation and engagement in these diabetes social media groups has been mostly linked to positive effects, very little is known about the content that is shared on these channels or the post features that engage their users the most.

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze (1) the content and features of posts shared over a 3-year period on 3 diabetes social media channels (Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram) of a diabetes association, and (2) users' engagement with these posts (likes, comments, and shares).

Methods: All social media posts published from the Norwegian Diabetes Association between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, were extracted. Two independent reviewers classified the posts into 7 categories based on their content. The interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen kappa. Regression analyses were carried out to analyze the effects of content topic, social media channel, and post features on users' engagement (likes, comments, and shares).

Results: A total of 1449 messages were posted. Posts of interviews and personal stories received 111% more likes, 106% more comments, and 112% more shares than miscellaneous posts (all P<.001). Messages posted about awareness days and other celebrations were 41% more likely to receive likes than miscellaneous posts (P<.001). Conversely, posts on research and innovation received 31% less likes (P<.001), 35% less comments (P=.02), and 25% less shares (P=.03) than miscellaneous posts. Health education posts received 38% less comments (P=.003) but were shared 39% more than miscellaneous posts (P=.007). With regard to social media channel, Facebook and Instagram posts were both 35 times more likely than Twitter posts to receive likes, and 60 times and almost 10 times more likely to receive comments, respectively (P<.001). Compared to text-only posts, those with videos had 3 times greater chance of receiving likes, almost 4 times greater chance of receiving comments, and 2.5 times greater chance of being shared (all P<.001). Including both videos and emoji in posts increased the chances of receiving likes by almost 7 times (P<.001). Adding an emoji to posts increased their chances of receiving likes and being shared by 71% and 144%, respectively (P<.001).

Conclusions: Diabetes social media users seem to be least engaged in posts with content topics that a priori could be linked to greater empowerment: research and innovation on diabetes, and health education. Diabetes social media groups, public health authorities, and other stakeholders interested in sharing research and innovation content and promoting health education on social media should consider including videos and emoji in their posts, and publish on popular and visual-based social media channels, such as Facebook and Instagram, to increase user engagement.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1186/s12913-018-3178-7.

Keywords: Facebook; Instagram; Twitter; diabetes; engagement; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of diabetes-related posts on 3 social media channels according to content (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stellefson M, Paige S, Apperson A, Spratt S. Social Media Content Analysis of Public Diabetes Facebook Groups. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Mar 31;13(3):428–438. doi: 10.1177/1932296819839099. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tenderich A, Tenderich B, Barton T, Richards SE. What Are PWDs (People With Diabetes) Doing Online? A Netnographic Analysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019;13(2):187–197. doi: 10.1177/1932296818813192. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Årsand E, Bradway M, Gabarron E. What Are Diabetes Patients Versus Health Care Personnel Discussing on Social Media? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jan 13;13(2):198–205. doi: 10.1177/1932296818821649. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gabarron E, Bradway M, Årsand E. What are diabetes patients discussing on social media? Int J Integr Care. 2016 Nov 09;16(5):14. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2600. - DOI
    1. Mattson MJ, Hall JG. Health as communication nexus : a service-learning approach. United States: Dubuque, IA : Kendall Hunt Publishing Company; 2011. Linking health communication with social support.

Publication types