Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Sep 25;99(39):e22394.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022394.

Perioperative analgesia after intrathecal morphine or local infiltration anesthesia for total knee replacement: A protocol for randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Perioperative analgesia after intrathecal morphine or local infiltration anesthesia for total knee replacement: A protocol for randomized controlled trial

Zhengrong Qi et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Expression of concern in

  • Expression of Concern: Study Protocols.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Nov 7;104(45):e46330. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000046330. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 41204616 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Objective: We perform this protocol for randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of intrathecal morphine and local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) in the treatment of the postoperative pain after total knee replacement (TKR).

Methods: This is a randomized controlled, single center trial which was performed from March 2019 to March 2020. This trial is conducted according to the SPIRIT Checklist of randomized researches. It is authorized via the Ethics Committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital (2019-P2-050-01). Eighty participants who undergo TKR were randomized into 2 groups. Intrathecal morphine group: 0.1 mg of the morphine was intrathecally injected, and the spinal anesthetic was injected at the same time in the group LIA; In the LIA group: the knee joint was infiltrated with epinephrine, ketorologic acid and ropivacaine in the process of operation, and the identical mixture was injected 2 bolus through the intraarticular catheter after operation. The main outcome variables were the visual analog scale and the consumption amount of opioid every 6-hour interval within 2 days postoperatively. The secondary outcome variables were the side effects associated with opioid, the length of hospital stay, motion range, and the loss of blood collected by the closed suction drainage. All the required analyses were carried out via applying the SPSS for Windows Version 19.0.

Results: The clinical outcome variables between groups were shown in .

Conclusion: This protocol will provide the evidence on which technique can achieve better analgesia after TKR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

References

    1. Rat AC, Guillemin F, Osnowycz G, et al. Total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis: mid- and long-term quality of life. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:54–62. - PubMed
    1. Evans JT, Whitehouse MR. Partial versus total knee replacement for knee osteoarthritis. Lancet 2019;394:712–3. - PubMed
    1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol 2007;89:780–5. - PubMed
    1. Song SJ. Pain management and anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2017;29:77–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elmallah RK, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, et al. Pain control in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018;31:504–13. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms