Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):474.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02885-6.

The reliability and validity of PHQ-9 in patients with major depressive disorder in psychiatric hospital

Yue Sun  1   2 , Zhaoyan Fu  1   2 , Qijing Bo  3   4 , Zhen Mao  1   2 , Xin Ma  1   2 , Chuanyue Wang  1   2
Affiliations

The reliability and validity of PHQ-9 in patients with major depressive disorder in psychiatric hospital

Yue Sun et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: To assess the reliability and validity of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and to assess the feasibility of its use in psychiatric hospitals in China.

Methods: One hundred nine outpatients or inpatients with MDD who qualified the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria completed PHQ-9 and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17). Two weeks after the initial evaluation, 54 randomly selected patients underwent repeat assessment using PHQ-9. For validity analysis, the construct validity and criterion validity were assessed. The internal concordance coefficient and the test-retest correlation coefficients were used for reliability analysis. The correlation between total score and scores for each item and the correlation between scores for various items were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: Principal components factor analysis showed good construct validity of the PHQ-9. PHQ-9 total score showed a positive correlation with HAMD-17 total score (r = 0.610, P < 0.001). With HAMD as the standard, PHQ-9 depression scores of 7, 15, and 21 points were used as cut-offs for mild, moderate, and severe depression, respectively. Consistency assessment was conducted between the depression severity as assessed by PHQ-9 and HAMD (Kappa = 0.229, P < 0.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient between PHQ-9 total score and HAMD total score was 0.594 (95% confidence interval, 0.456-0.704, P < 0.001). The Cronbach's α coefficient of PHQ-9 was 0.892. Correlation coefficients between each item score and the total score ranged from 0.567-0.789 (P < 0.01); the correlation coefficient between various item scores ranged from 0.233-0.747. The test-retest correlation coefficient for total score was 0.737.

Conclusions: PHQ-9 showed good reliability and validity, and high adaptability for patients with MDD in psychiatric hospital. It is a simple, rapid, effective, and reliable tool for screening and evaluation of the severity of depression.

Keywords: Major depressive disorder; PHQ-9; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration of the study design and patient-selection criteria. PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; PCC, primary care clinic; HAMD-17: Hamilton Depression Scale 17 items; DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Regression line graph of PHQ-9 total scores and HAMD total scores. PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire; HAMD: Hamilton Depression Scale
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bonadiman CSC, Passos VMA, Mooney M, Naghavi M, Melo APS. The burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders in Brazil: global burden of disease study, 1990 and 2015. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017;20(Suppl 01):191–204. - PubMed
    1. Rush AJ, Fava M, Wisniewski SR, Lavori PW, Trivedi MH, Sackeim HA, Thase ME, Nierenberg AA, Quitkin FM, Kashner TM, et al. Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25(1):119–142. - PubMed
    1. Sussman N. TransIating science into service: lessons learned from the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STARD) study. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9(5):331–337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yeung AS, Jing Y, Brenneman SK, Chang TE, Baer L, Hebden T, Kalsekar I, McQuade RD, Kurlander J, Siebenaler J, et al. Clinical outcomes in measurement-based treatment (comet): a trial of depression monitoring and feedback to primary care physicians. Depress Anxiety. 2012;29(10):865–873. - PubMed
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Lowe B. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(4):345–359. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources