COVID-19: instruments for the allocation of mechanical ventilators-a narrative review
- PMID: 32993736
- PMCID: PMC7522926
- DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03298-3
COVID-19: instruments for the allocation of mechanical ventilators-a narrative review
Abstract
After the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic, the elaboration of comprehensive and preventive public policies became important in order to stop the spread of the disease. However, insufficient or ineffective measures may have placed health professionals and services in the position of having to allocate mechanical ventilators. This study aimed to identify instruments, analyze their structures, and present the main criteria used in the screening protocols, in order to help the development of guidelines and policies for the allocation of mechanical ventilators in the COVID-19 pandemic. The instruments have a low level of scientific evidence, and, in general, are structured by various clinical, non-clinical, and tiebreaker criteria that contain ethical aspects. Few instruments included public participation in their construction or validation. We believe that the elaboration of these guidelines cannot be restricted to specialists as this question involves ethical considerations which make the participation of the population necessary. Finally, we propose seventeen elements that can support the construction of screening protocols in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: Decision making; Ethics; Health care rationing; Pandemics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) situation report – 10. January 30, 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/2.... Accessed 16 Aug 2020.
-
- Halpern SD, Truog RD, Miller FG. Cognitive bias and public health policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020. 10.1001/jama.2020.11623. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
