Complications and Complication Avoidance With Cervical Total Disc Replacement
- PMID: 32994306
- PMCID: PMC7528766
- DOI: 10.14444/7091
Complications and Complication Avoidance With Cervical Total Disc Replacement
Abstract
Complications with cervical arthroplasty can be generalized to errors in patient selection or surgical technique. Patients with advanced spondylosis or osteophytic disease, severe facet arthropathy, osteoporosis, sagittal deformity, or preoperative instability are poor candidates for arthroplasty and are more prone to complications. Poor surgical technique can result in subsidence, expulsion, and kyphosis, and it can contribute to heterotopic ossification. Additionally, all of the inherent complications from an anterior cervical approach may occur with cervical artificial disc placement. This article will focus on the complications uniquely associated with cervical arthroplasty.
Keywords: cervical arthroplasty; cervical artificial disc; total disc replacement.
This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2020 ISASS.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 19850532
-
Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: Clinical article.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jun;16(6):594-600. doi: 10.3171/2012.2.SPINE111066. Epub 2012 Mar 23. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22443547
-
Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 25555050
-
High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):141-6. doi: 10.3171/2012.4.SPINE12223. Epub 2012 Jun 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22657947 Review.
-
Past, present, and future of cervical arthroplasty.Keio J Med. 2013;62(2):47-52. doi: 10.2302/kjm.2012-0014-re. Keio J Med. 2013. PMID: 23803346 Review.
Cited by
-
The insane path of two cervical intervertebral implants: late migration, esophageal ingrowth, and rectal excretion: an exceptional case report.J Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 20;10(4):738-744. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-23. Epub 2024 Oct 21. J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 39816769 Free PMC article.
-
Finite element analysis of optimized novel additively manufactured non-articulating prostheses for cervical total disc replacement.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 1;11:1182265. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1182265. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37324423 Free PMC article.
-
Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc.Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1292-1299. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08129-5. Epub 2024 Feb 16. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38363365
-
Risk Factors for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Subsidence with Bryan Disc-A Retrospective Observational Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 10;13(6):1589. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061589. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38541814 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical management of bone loss in cervical total disc arthroplasty: literature review and treatment recommendations.Eur Spine J. 2024 Aug;33(8):2969-2981. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08407-2. Epub 2024 Jul 16. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 39009847 Review.
References
-
- Hacker FM, Babcock RM, Hacker RJ. Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site. Spine. 2013;38(26):2223–2226. - PubMed
-
- Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Kenneth Burkus J, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(6):653–667. - PubMed
-
- Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W, et al. Long-term clinical experience with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical artificial disc for 1-level cervical disc disease: results from seven-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial. Int J Spine Surg. 2018;12(3):377–387. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Wang LN, Hu BW, Wang L, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2017-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, et al. Occurrence and clinical implications of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP Cervical Disc at 2 contiguous levels. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;13:1–10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources