Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;17(3):291-299.
doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0516. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Healthcare utilization and total costs of care among patients with advanced metastatic gastric and esophageal cancer

Affiliations
Free article

Healthcare utilization and total costs of care among patients with advanced metastatic gastric and esophageal cancer

Pranav Abraham et al. Future Oncol. 2021 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Aim: Study first-line (1L) treatment patterns and economic outcomes among patients with advanced metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and esophageal cancer (EC). Materials & methods: Newly diagnosed patients with systemic GC and EC treatments were identified between 1 January 2011 and 31 July 2017; costs were presented as per patient per month (PPPM) basis. Results: Study included 392 GC and 436 EC patients. Most frequently used 1L regimens were: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + oxaliplatin (22.5%) and epirubicin + cisplatin + 5-FU (ECF)/ECF modifications (21.9%) in patients with GC; and carboplatin + paclitaxel (29.6%) and 5-FU + oxaliplatin (11.5%) in EC patients. Mean all-cause costs were US$16,242 PPPM for GC, and $18,384 PPPM for EC during 1L treatment. Conclusion: GC and EC were resource intensive and costly. High costs and short treatment durations underscored a gap in care in 1L treatment.

Keywords: esophageal cancer; first-line systemic treatment; gastric cancer; second-line systemic treatment; treatment pattern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources