Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;120(6):1419-1424.
doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01508-x. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Contrast-induced neurotoxicity related to neurological endovascular procedures: a systematic review

Affiliations

Contrast-induced neurotoxicity related to neurological endovascular procedures: a systematic review

Miguel Quintas-Neves et al. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Contrast-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is an adverse reaction to contrast agents which can occur in the context of diagnostic and therapeutic neurological endovascular procedures. Our goal was to conduct a systematic review of patients reported in the literature diagnosed with CIN after neurological endovascular procedures. A systematic search of EMBASE and MEDLINE databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years; neurological endovascular procedure performed ≤ 24 h before ictus; new manifestations compatible with encephalic dysfunction; imaging performed < 7 days after ictus; exclusion of other causes and manifestations attributed to pre-existing conditions. Forty-eight patients were included, of which 60.4% were female and 60.4% had arterial hypertension; median age was 63 years. The most frequent procedure was diagnostic cerebral angiography (n = 24, 50.0%) and non-ionic contrast agents were more frequently used (n = 40, 83.3%). Twenty-six patients (54.2%) developed clinical manifestations compatible with CIN during or immediately after the procedure, and the most frequent manifestations were encephalopathy, cortical blindness and motor deficit. The most frequent imaging findings were cortical contrast enhancement on CT (n = 23/42), and cortical sulci effacement (n = 18/48). Most patients presented complete clinical recovery (89.6%) at a median time of 3 days. Among patients with neuroimaging changes who underwent follow-up, complete regression of the abnormalities was shown in 81.5% at a median time of 5 days. CIN is a rare adverse reaction in the context of neurological endovascular procedures. Recognition of clinical manifestations and typical imaging abnormalities, while excluding other causes, is essential for diagnosis.

Keywords: Angiography; Cerebral; Contrast-induced neurotoxicity; Endovascular.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Antunes JL (1974) Egas Moniz and cerebral angiography. J Neurosurg 40:427–432 - DOI
    1. Silverman SM, Bergman PS, Bender MB (1961) The dynamics of transient cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol 4:333–348 - DOI
    1. Spina R, Simon N, Markus R, Muller DW, Kathir K (2017) Contrast-induced encephalopathy following cardiac catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 90:257–268 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mentzel HJ, Blume J, Malich A, Fitzek C, Reichenbach JR, Kaiser WA (2003) Cortical blindness after contrast-enhanced CT: complication in a patient with diabetes insipidus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1114–1116
    1. Wishart DL (1971) Complications in vertebral angiography as compared to non-vertebral cerebral angiography in 447 studies. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 11:527–537 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources