Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Nov 20;38(33):3937-3946.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00995. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Five-Year Outcomes With Nivolumab in Patients With Wild-Type BRAF Advanced Melanoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Five-Year Outcomes With Nivolumab in Patients With Wild-Type BRAF Advanced Melanoma

Caroline Robert et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The CheckMate 066 trial investigated nivolumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. Five-year results are presented herein.

Patients and methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III study, 418 patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage III/IV, wild-type BRAF melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

Results: Patients were followed for a minimum of 60 months from the last patient randomly assigned (median follow-up, 32.0 months for nivolumab and 10.9 months for dacarbazine). Five-year OS rates were 39% with nivolumab and 17% with dacarbazine; PFS rates were 28% and 3%, respectively. Five-year OS was 38% in patients randomly assigned to dacarbazine who had subsequent therapy, including nivolumab (n = 37). ORR was 42% with nivolumab and 14% with dacarbazine; among patients alive at 5 years, ORR was 81% and 39%, respectively. Of 42 patients treated with nivolumab who had a complete response (20%), 88% (37 of 42) were alive as of the 5-year analysis. Among 75 nivolumab-treated patients alive and evaluable at the 5-year analysis, 83% had not received subsequent therapy; 23% were still on study treatment, and 60% were treatment free. Safety analyses were similar to the 3-year report.

Conclusion: Results from this 5-year analysis confirm the significant benefit of nivolumab over dacarbazine for all end points and add to the growing body of evidence supporting long-term survival with nivolumab mono-therapy. Survival is strongly associated with achieving a durable response, which can be maintained after treatment discontinuation, even without subsequent systemic therapies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01721772.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Kaplan-Meier plot of (A) overall survival (OS) and (B) progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who received nivolumab (NIVO) or dacarbazine (DTIC). Median survival time was 37.3 months (95% CI, 25.4 to 51.6 months) in the NIVO group and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 13.0 months) in the DTIC group. Median time to progression or death was 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 12.2 months) in the NIVO group and 2.2 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 2.5 months) in the DTIC group. Rates at earlier time points are based on 5-year analysis and, therefore, may differ slightly from those available for previous reports.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival (OS) in patients who received nivolumab (NIVO) or dacarbazine (DTIC) with (A) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≤ the upper limit of normal (ULN), (B) LDH > ULN, (C) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) < 5%, and (D) PD-L1 ≥ 5%. For LDH ≤ ULN, median survival time was 53.4 months (95% CI, 37.6 months to not reached [NR]) in the NIVO group and 18.4 months (95% CI, 13.0 to 22.9 months) in the DTIC group, and for LDH > ULN, median survival time was 12.8 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 25.5 months) in the NIVO group and 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 8.4 months) in the DTIC group. For PD-L1 < 5%, median survival time was 27.5 months (95% CI, 18.2 to 38.0 months) in the NIVO group and 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 13.0 months) in the DTIC group, and for PD-L1 ≥ 5%, median survival time was NR (95% CI, 42.4 months to NR) in the NIVO group and 9.7 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 13.5 months) in the DTIC group.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who received nivolumab (NIVO) or dacarbazine (DTIC) with (A) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≤ the upper limit of normal (ULN), (B) LDH > ULN, (C) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) < 5%, and (D) PD-L1 ≥ 5%. For LDH ≤ ULN, median time to progression or death was 12.2 months (95% CI, 5.0 to 22.8 months) in the NIVO group and 2.4 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 3.4 months) in the DTIC group, and for LDH > ULN, median time to progression or death was 2.1 months (95% CI, 2.0 to 3.3 months) in the NIVO group and 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.4 months) in the DTIC group. For PD-L1 < 5%, median time to progression or death was 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 7.6 months) in the NIVO group and 2.2 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 3.3 months) in the DTIC group, and for PD-L1 ≥ 5%, median time to progression or death was 32.7 months (95% CI, 5.1 months to not reached) in the NIVO group and 2.1 months (95% CI, 2.0 to 2.4 months) in the DTIC group.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
(A) Response to treatment in all patients and proportion alive at 5 years of follow-up and Kaplan-Meier plots of (B) overall survival (OS) and (C) progression-free survival (PFS) from landmark 12-month analyses by individual response in patients on nivolumab (NIVO). Median survival time was not reached (NR) in patients with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), 42.4 months (95% CI, 28.19 to 52.01 months) in patients with stable disease (SD), and 26.9 months (95% CI, 22.34 to 47.11 months) in patients with progressive disease (PD). Median time to progression or death was NR (95% CI, 54.44 months to NR) in patients with a CR, NR in patients with a PR, and 22.8 months (95% CI, 17.51 months to NR) in patients with SD. aIntention to treat (ITT; NIVO): objective response rate (ORR), 42%; response in patients not evaluable, 23 (11%) of 210. bPatients alive at 5 years (NIVO): ORR, 80%; response in patients not evaluable, two (3%) of 78. cITT (DTIC): ORR, 14%; response in patients not evaluable, 31 (15%) of 208. dPatients alive at 5 years (DTIC): ORR, 39%; response in patients not evaluable, zero of 33.

References

    1. Bhatia S, Tykodi SS, Thompson JA: Treatment of metastatic melanoma: An overview. Oncology (Williston Park) 23:488-496, 2009 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larkin J Chiarion-Sileni V Gonzalez R, et al. : Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 381:1535-1546, 2019 - PubMed
    1. Robert C Ribas A Schachter J, et al. : Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): Post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 20:1239-1251, 2019 - PubMed
    1. Robert C Schachter J Long GV, et al. : Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 372:2521-2532, 2015 - PubMed
    1. Larkin J Chiarion-Sileni V Gonzalez R, et al. : Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 373:23-34, 2015 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data