Clinical Decision Support for Worker Health: A Five-Site Qualitative Needs Assessment in Primary Care Settings
- PMID: 32998170
- PMCID: PMC7557326
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715895
Clinical Decision Support for Worker Health: A Five-Site Qualitative Needs Assessment in Primary Care Settings
Abstract
Background: Although patients who work and have related health issues are usually first seen in primary care, providers in these settings do not routinely ask questions about work. Guidelines to help manage such patients are rarely used in primary care. Electronic health record (EHR) systems with worker health clinical decision support (CDS) tools have potential for assisting these practices.
Objective: This study aimed to identify the need for, and barriers and facilitators related to, implementation of CDS tools for the clinical management of working patients in a variety of primary care settings.
Methods: We used a qualitative design that included analysis of interview transcripts and observational field notes from 10 clinics in five organizations.
Results: We interviewed 83 providers, staff members, managers, informatics and information technology experts, and leaders and spent 35 hours observing. We identified eight themes in four categories related to CDS for worker health (operational issues, usefulness of proposed CDS, effort and time-related issues, and topic-specific issues). These categories were classified as facilitators or barriers to the use of the CDS tools. Facilitators related to operational issues include current technical feasibility and new work patterns associated with the coordinated care model. Facilitators concerning usefulness include users' need for awareness and evidence-based tools, appropriateness of the proposed CDS for their patients, and the benefits of population health data. Barriers that are effort-related include additional time this proposed CDS might take, and other pressing organizational priorities. Barriers that are topic-specific include sensitive issues related to health and work and the complexities of information about work.
Conclusion: We discovered several themes not previously described that can guide future CDS development: technical feasibility of the proposed CDS within commercial EHRs, the sensitive nature of some CDS content, and the need to assist the entire health care team in managing worker health.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Development of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Implement Asthma Management Guidelines in Pediatric Primary Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 18;9:e65794. doi: 10.2196/65794. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40100268 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations to increase the use of a clinical decision support tool for managing chronic pain in primary care.Int J Med Inform. 2024 Dec;192:105649. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105649. Epub 2024 Oct 10. Int J Med Inform. 2024. PMID: 39427385
-
Pre-implementation adaptation of primary care cancer prevention clinical decision support in a predominantly rural healthcare system.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01136-8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020. PMID: 32576202 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Electronic Health Record-Integrated Clinical Decision Support for Clinicians Serving Populations Facing Health Care Disparities: Literature Review.Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):184-198. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742518. Epub 2022 Dec 4. Yearb Med Inform. 2022. PMID: 36463877 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integrating pharmacogenomics into electronic health records with clinical decision support.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Dec 1;73(23):1967-1976. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160030. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016. PMID: 27864204 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 10;25:e39742. doi: 10.2196/39742. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 36626192 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 12;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01339-x. Implement Sci. 2024. PMID: 38347525 Free PMC article.
-
Nothing for Me or About Me, Without Me: Codesign of Clinical Decision Support.Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May;13(3):641-646. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750355. Epub 2022 Jun 29. Appl Clin Inform. 2022. PMID: 35768012 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review, novel taxonomy and catalogue of implementation frameworks for clinical decision support systems.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02739-1. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 39487462 Free PMC article.
-
Human Factors and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics: Innovations and Opportunities.Yearb Med Inform. 2021 Aug;30(1):91-99. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726511. Epub 2021 Sep 3. Yearb Med Inform. 2021. PMID: 34479382 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Goldman R H, Peters J M. The occupational and environmental health history. JAMA. 1981;246(24):2831–2836. - PubMed
-
- Shofer S, Haus B M, Kuschner W G. Quality of occupational history assessments in working age adults with newly diagnosed asthma. Chest. 2006;130(02):455–462. - PubMed
-
- Politi B J, Arena V C, Schwerha J, Sussman N. Occupational medical history taking: how are today's physicians doing? A cross-sectional investigation of the frequency of occupational history taking by physicians in a major US teaching center. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(06):550–555. - PubMed
-
- Mazurek J M, Storey E. Physician-patient communication regarding asthma and work. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(01):72–75. - PubMed