Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 28;10(10):1376.
doi: 10.3390/biom10101376.

Crosstalk between Opioid and Anti-Opioid Systems: An Overview and Its Possible Therapeutic Significance

Affiliations
Review

Crosstalk between Opioid and Anti-Opioid Systems: An Overview and Its Possible Therapeutic Significance

Ewa Gibula-Tarlowska et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Opioid peptides and receptors are broadly expressed throughout peripheral and central nervous systems and have been the subject of intense long-term investigations. Such studies indicate that some endogenous neuropeptides, called anti-opioids, participate in a homeostatic system that tends to reduce the effects of endogenous and exogenous opioids. Anti-opioid properties have been attributed to various peptides, including melanocyte inhibiting factor (MIF)-related peptides, cholecystokinin (CCK), nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), and neuropeptide FF (NPFF). These peptides counteract some of the acute effects of opioids, and therefore, they are involved in the development of opioid tolerance and addiction. In this work, the anti-opioid profile of endogenous peptides was described, mainly taking into account their inhibitory influence on opioid-induced effects. However, the anti-opioid peptides demonstrated complex properties and could show opioid-like as well as anti-opioid effects. The aim of this review is to detail the phenomenon of crosstalk taking place between opioid and anti-opioid systems at the in vivo pharmacological level and to propose a cellular and molecular basis for these interactions. A better knowledge of these mechanisms has potential therapeutic interest for the control of opioid functions, notably for alleviating pain and/or for the treatment of opioid abuse.

Keywords: MIF-1; NPFF; anti-opioids; cholecystokinin; kissorphin; nociceptin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed model for the pharmacological action of drugs of abuse in the ventral tegmental area–nucleus accumbens pathway. DAT: dopamine transporter.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bodnar R.J. Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2014. Peptides. 2016;75:18–70. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.10.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waldhoer M., Bartlett S.E., Whistler J.L. Opioid receptors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004;73:953–990. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073940. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dhawan B.N., Cesselin F., Raghubir R., Reisine T., Bradley P.B., Portoghese P.S., Hamon M. International Union of Pharmacology. XII. Classification of opioid receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 1996;48:567–592. - PubMed
    1. Gray A.C., Coupar I.M., White P.J. Comparison of opioid receptor distributions in the rat ileum. Life Sci. 2006;78:1610–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.07.048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wittert G., Hope P., Pyle D. Tissue distribution of opioid receptor gene expression in the rat. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996;218:877–881. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0156. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources